Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616365›Full record

ReviewCurrent otorhinolaryngology reports2017

Caroline Bergenfelz, Anders P Hakansson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current otorhinolaryngology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A case report of disseminatedAccess microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Role ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Serotype Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Innate Immunity in the Middle Ear Mucosa.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline BergenfelzDivision of Experimental Infection Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, Wallenberg Laboratory, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilsson's Street 53, 20502 Malmö, SE Sweden.
Anders P HakanssonDivision of Experimental Infection Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, Wallenberg Laboratory, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilsson's Street 53, 20502 Malmö, SE Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis study aimed to review the literature regarding the mechanisms of transition from asymptomatic colonization to induction of otitis media and how the insight into the pathogenesis of otitis media has the potential to help design future otitis media-directed vaccines. RECENT

findingsRespiratory viruses have long been shown to predispose individuals to bacterial respiratory infections, such as otitis media. Recent information suggests that SUMMARY: Our recent findings are reviewed in the context of the current literature on the epidemiology and pathogenesis of otitis media. We also discuss how other otopathogens, such as

Indexed as

BiofilmMicrobiomeOtitis mediaStreptococcus pneumoniaVaccine

Identifiers

PMID28616365
PMCPMC5446555
OpenAlexW2616519181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.