Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616255›Full record

ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2017

Global health governance in the sustainable development goals: Is it grounded in the right to health?

Remco Van de Pas, Peter S Hill, Rachel Hammonds, Gorik Ooms, Lisa Forman, Attiya Waris, Claire E Brolan, Martin McKee, Devi Sridhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Empirical dynamic modeling of the association between ambient PMEcotoxicology and environmental safety · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Framing the Health Workforce Agenda Beyond Economic Growth.International journal of health policy and management · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Brief communication International cooperation in a non-ideal world: the example of COVAX.Cadernos ibero-americanos de direito sanitario = Cuadernos iberoamericanos de derecho sanitario
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Remco Van de PasDepartment of Public HealthInstitute of Tropical Medicine, AntwerpAntwerpen2000Belgium.
Peter S HillSchool of Public HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbane4072QueenslandAustralia.
Rachel HammondsFaculty of Law, Law and Development Research GroupUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpen2000Belgium.
Gorik OomsHeidelberg University HospitalInstitute of Public HealthHeidelbergBaden-Württemberg69120Germany.
Lisa FormanUniversity of TorontoDalla Lana School of Public HealthTorontoOntarioM5T3M7Canada.
Attiya WarisUniversity of NairobiNairobiKenya.
Claire E BrolanSchool of Public HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbane4072QueenslandAustralia.
Martin McKeeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK.
Devi SridharUniversity of EdinburghCentre for Global Health ResearchEdinburghEH8 9YLUK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the extent to which global health governance - in the context of the early implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals is grounded in the right to health. The essential components of the right to health in relation to global health are unpacked. Four essential functions of the global health system are assessed from a normative, rights-based, analysis on how each of these governance functions should operate. These essential functions are: the production of global public goods, the management of externalities across countries, the mobilization of global solidarity, and stewardship. The paper maps the current reality of global health governance now that the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals are beginning to be implemented. In theory, the existing human rights legislation would enable the principles and basis for the global governance of health beyond the premise of the state. In practice, there is a governance gap between the human rights framework and practices in global health and development policies. This gap can be explained by the political determinants of health that shape the governance of these global policies. Current representations of the right to health in the Sustainable Development Goals are insufficient and superficial, because they do not explicitly link commitments or right to health discourse to binding treaty obligations for duty-bearing nation states or entitlements by people. If global health policy is to meaningfully contribute to the realization of the right to health and to rights based global health governance then future iterations of global health policy must bridge this gap. This includes scholarship and policy debate on the structure, politics, and agency to overcome existing global health injustices.

Indexed as

Ebolaglobal healthglobal health governancehuman rightsright to healthSustainable Development Goals

Identifiers

PMID28616255
PMCPMC5445596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.