Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616197›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Production of plumage ornaments among males and females of two closely related tropical passerine bird species.

Erik D Enbody, Samantha M Lantz, Jordan Karubian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik D EnbodyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tulane University New Orleans LA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1349-628X
Samantha M LantzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tulane University New Orleans LA USA.
Jordan KarubianDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tulane University New Orleans LA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of elaborate secondary sexual traits (i.e., ornaments) is well-studied in males but less so in females. Similarity in the appearance of ornaments between males and females supports the view that female ornaments arise as a neutral byproduct of selection on male traits due to genetic correlation between sexes, but recent research suggests an adaptive function of female ornaments in at least some contexts. Information on the degree to which production of ornaments differs between the sexes can shed light on these alternative perspectives. We therefore characterized the structural underpinnings of melanin-based plumage production in males and females of two closely related passerine bird species (genus

Indexed as

birdselectron microscopyfeather structureMalurus fairywrensplumage colorsignal evolutionsocial selection

Identifiers

PMID28616197
PMCPMC5468133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.