Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616017›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2017

Inhibition and enhancement of neural regeneration by chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans.

Heikki Rauvala, Mikhail Paveliev, Juha Kuja-Panula, Natalia Kulesskaya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Type IIa RPTPs and Glycans: Roles in Axon Regeneration and Synaptogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Glycosylation in Axonal Guidance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Glycosaminoglycans in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Galactosaminoglycans: Medical Applications and Drawbacks.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deciphering functional glycosaminoglycan motifs in development.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018
    Review
  20. Potential immunotherapies for traumatic brain and spinal cord injury.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heikki RauvalaNeuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7809-9811
Mikhail PavelievNeuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Juha Kuja-PanulaNeuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Natalia KulesskayaNeuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current dogma in neural regeneration research implies that chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) inhibit plasticity and regeneration in the adult central nervous system (CNS). We argue that the role of the CSPGs can be reversed from inhibition to activation by developmentally expressed CSPG-binding factors. Heparin-binding growth-associated molecule (HB-GAM; also designated as pleiotrophin) has been studied as a candidate molecule that might modulate the role of CSPG matrices in plasticity and regeneration. Studies

Indexed as

aggrecanaxon regenerationCNS injurydendrite regenerationglypicanHB-GAMpleiotrophinproteoglycansPTEN

Identifiers

PMID28616017
PMCPMC5461598
OpenAlexW2619591902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.