Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615938›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2017

High drug-loading nanomedicines: progress, current status, and prospects.

Shihong Shen, Youshen Wu, Yongchun Liu, Daocheng Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05978791 (Study on the Thrombolytic Effect of Platelet Membrane Coated Recombinant Staphylokinase on Human Arterial Thrombus), which is not on this map. Cited by 194 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05978791 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Study on the Thrombolytic Effect of Platelet Membrane Coated Recombinant Staphylokinase on Human Arterial Thrombus

TypeobservationalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsArterial ThrombosisArmscollection of venous blood or arterial blood
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Global research trends of nanotechnology for pain management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. FeiScience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Nanoparticle-Integrated Complete Manufacturing Pipeline of Chemically Engineered Exosomes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structure-Selective Polydopamine Coating on Drug Nanoparticles.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shihong ShenKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Education Ministry, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Youshen WuKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Education Ministry, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Yongchun LiuKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Education Ministry, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Daocheng WuKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Education Ministry, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug molecules transformed into nanoparticles or endowed with nanostructures with or without the aid of carrier materials are referred to as "nanomedicines" and can overcome some inherent drawbacks of free drugs, such as poor water solubility, high drug dosage, and short drug half-life in vivo. However, most of the existing nanomedicines possess the drawback of low drug-loading (generally less than 10%) associated with more carrier materials. For intravenous administration, the extensive use of carrier materials might cause systemic toxicity and impose an extra burden of degradation, metabolism, and excretion of the materials for patients. Therefore, on the premise of guaranteeing therapeutic effect and function, reducing or avoiding the use of carrier materials is a promising alternative approach to solve these problems. Recently, high drug-loading nanomedicines, which have a drug-loading content higher than 10%, are attracting increasing interest. According to the fabrication strategies of nanomedicines, high drug-loading nanomedicines are divided into four main classes: nanomedicines with inert porous material as carrier, nanomedicines with drug as part of carrier, carrier-free nanomedicines, and nanomedicines following niche and complex strategies. To date, most of the existing high drug-loading nanomedicines belong to the first class, and few research studies have focused on other classes. In this review, we investigate the research status of high drug-loading nanomedicines and discuss the features of their fabrication strategies and optimum proposal in detail. We also point out deficiencies and developing direction of high drug-loading nanomedicines. We envision that high drug-loading nanomedicines will occupy an important position in the field of drug-delivery systems, and hope that novel perspectives will be proposed for the development of high drug-loading nanomedicines.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanomedicineNanoparticlesNanostructuresDrug Carriersfabrication strategyhigh drug loadingnanocarriersnanomedicinesoptimum proposal

Identifiers

PMID28615938
PMCPMC5459982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.