Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615340›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2017

Perspectives on classical controversies about the motor cortex.

Mohsen Omrani, Matthew T Kaufman, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, Paul D Cheney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuromotor modules revealed by direct electrical stimulation of the human primary motor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the Consistent Roles of Motor Areas Across Voluntary Movement and Locomotion.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Preparatory activity and the expansive null-space.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen OmraniBrain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey; mohsen.omrani@rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0461-1947
Matthew T KaufmanCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-023X
Nicholas G HatsopoulosDepartment of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, Committees on Computational Neuroscience and Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Paul D CheneyDepartment of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Funding

Research Design and Analysis Core (RDAC)P30HD002528 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 1985 to 2015
$22.1M
Coding of Action by Motor & Premotor Cortical EnsemblesR01NS045853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HATSOPOULOS, NICHOLAS G · 2004 to 2017
$4.5M
Electrical Stimulation of Cortical Motor OutputR01NS051825 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENEY, PAUL DAVID · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
CIHRNICHD NIH HHS P30 HD002528NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045853NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary motor cortex has been studied for more than a century, yet a consensus on its functional contribution to movement control is still out of reach. In particular, there remains controversy as to the level of control produced by motor cortex ("low-level" movement dynamics vs. "high-level" movement kinematics) and the role of sensory feedback. In this review, we present different perspectives on the two following questions: What does activity in motor cortex reflect? and How do planned motor commands interact with incoming sensory feedback during movement? The four authors each present their independent views on how they think the primary motor cortex (M1) controls movement. At the end, we present a dialogue in which the authors synthesize their views and suggest possibilities for moving the field forward. While there is not yet a consensus on the role of M1 or sensory feedback in the control of upper limb movements, such dialogues are essential to take us closer to one.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansMotor CortexMovementmotor controlmovement dynamicsmovement kinematicsprimary motor cortexsensory feedback

Identifiers

PMID28615340
PMCPMC5599665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.