Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615339›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Interhemispheric interactions between trunk muscle representations of the primary motor cortex.

Loyda Jean-Charles, Jean-Francois Nepveu, Joan E Deffeyes, Guillaume Elgbeili, Numa Dancause, Dorothy Barthélemy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Loyda Jean-CharlesDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Francois NepveuDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Joan E DeffeyesDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Guillaume ElgbeiliRecherche en Schizophrénie et troubles neurodéveloppementaux, Institut universitaire en santé mentale Douglas, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Numa DancauseDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Dorothy BarthélemyCentre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain, site de l'Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; dorothy.barthelemy@umontreal.ca.
Université de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unilateral arm movements require trunk stabilization through bilateral contraction of axial muscles. Interhemispheric interactions between primary motor cortices (M1) could enable such coordinated contractions, but these mechanisms are largely unknown. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we characterized interhemispheric interactions between M1 representations of the trunk-stabilizing muscles erector spinae at the first lumbar vertebra (ES L1) during a right isometric shoulder flexion. These interactions were compared with those of the anterior deltoid (AD), the main agonist in this task, and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI). TMS over the right M1 elicited ipsilateral silent periods (iSP) in all three muscles on the right side. In ES L1, but not in AD or FDI, ipsilateral motor evoked potential (iMEP) could precede the iSP or replace it. iMEP amplitude was not significantly different whether ES L1 was used to stabilize the trunk or was voluntarily contracted. TMS at the cervicomedullary junction showed that the size of cervicomedullary evoked potential was unchanged during the iSP but increased during iMEP, suggesting that the iSP, but not the iMEP, is due to intracortical mechanisms. Using a dual-coil paradigm with two coils over the left and right M1, interhemispheric inhibition could be evoked at interstimulus intervals of 6 ms in ES L1 and 8 ms in AD and FDI. Together, these results suggest that interhemispheric inhibition is dominant when axial muscles are involved in a stabilizing task. The ipsilateral facilitation could be evoked by ipsilateral or subcortical pathways and could be used depending on the role axial muscles play in the task.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityAdultDeltoid MuscleEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexNeural InhibitionTorsoarmaxial muscleshumansinterhemispheric interactionstranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28615339
PMCPMC5596120
OpenAlexW2627052889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.