Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615338›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Activity of primate V1 neurons during the gap saccade task.

Kayeon Kim, Choongkil Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct context- and content-dependent population codes in superior colliculus during sensation and action.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayeon KimDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Kwanak, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Choongkil LeeDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Kwanak, Seoul, Republic of Korea cklee@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a saccadic eye movement is made toward a visual stimulus, the variability in accompanying primary visual cortex (V1) activity is related to saccade latency in both humans and simians. To understand the nature of this relationship, we examined the functional link between V1 activity and the initiation of visually guided saccades during the gap saccade task, in which a brief temporal gap is inserted between the turning off of a fixation stimulus and the appearance of a saccadic target. The insertion of such a gap robustly reduces saccade latency and facilitates the occurrence of extremely short-latency (express) saccades. Here we recorded single-cell activity from macaque V1 while monkeys performed the gap saccade task. In parallel with the gap effect on saccade latency the neural latency (time of first spike) of V1 response elicited by the saccade target became shorter, and the firing rate increased as the gap duration increased. Similarly, neural latency was shorter and firing rate was higher before express saccades relative to regular-latency saccades. In addition to these posttarget changes, the level of spontaneous spike activity during the pretarget period was negatively correlated with both neural and saccade latencies. These results demonstrate that V1 activity correlates with the gap effect and indicate that trial-to-trial variability in the state of V1 accompanies the variability of neural and behavioral latencies.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualSaccadesAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsReaction TimeVisual Cortexprimary visual cortexresponse timesaccadic eye movementsensorimotor transformationsingle-cell recording

Identifiers

PMID28615338
PMCPMC5558028
OpenAlexW2626484874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.