Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615286›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2017

The Physiology of Phagocytosis in the Context of Mitochondrial Origin.

William F Martin, Aloysius G M Tielens, Marek Mentel, Sriram G Garg, Sven B Gould

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Demand-only energetics at 120 ATP per glucose: A reply to Lynch.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantifying the fitness contribution of phagocytosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioenergetics evolution: the link between Earth's and Life's history.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. The cell biology and genome ofMolecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

William F MartinInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany bill@hhu.de gould@hhu.de.
Aloysius G M TielensDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marek MentelDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Sriram G GargInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-5228
Sven B GouldInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany bill@hhu.de gould@hhu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2038-8474
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEComenius University Bratislava · SKUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How mitochondria came to reside within the cytosol of their host has been debated for 50 years. Though current data indicate that the last eukaryote common ancestor possessed mitochondria and was a complex cell, whether mitochondria or complexity came first in eukaryotic evolution is still discussed. In autogenous models (complexity first), the origin of phagocytosis poses the limiting step at eukaryote origin, with mitochondria coming late as an undigested growth substrate. In symbiosis-based models (mitochondria first), the host was an archaeon, and the origin of mitochondria was the limiting step at eukaryote origin, with mitochondria providing bacterial genes, ATP synthesis on internalized bioenergetic membranes, and mitochondrion-derived vesicles as the seed of the eukaryote endomembrane system. Metagenomic studies are uncovering new host-related archaeal lineages that are reported as complex or phagocytosing, although images of such cells are lacking. Here we review the physiology and components of phagocytosis in eukaryotes, critically inspecting the concept of a phagotrophic host. From ATP supply and demand, a mitochondrion-lacking phagotrophic archaeal fermenter would have to ingest about 34 times its body weight in prokaryotic prey to obtain enough ATP to support one cell division. It would lack chemiosmotic ATP synthesis at the plasma membrane, because phagocytosis and chemiosmosis in the same membrane are incompatible. It would have lived from amino acid fermentations, because prokaryotes are mainly protein. Its ATP yield would have been impaired relative to typical archaeal amino acid fermentations, which involve chemiosmosis. In contrast, phagocytosis would have had great physiological benefit for a mitochondrion-bearing cell.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateArchaeaBiological EvolutionEndocytosisEnergy MetabolismEukaryotic CellsMetagenomicsMitochondriaPhagocytosisPhylogenyProkaryotic CellsSymbiosisAdenosine Triphosphateendocytic pathwayeukaryogenesiseukaryote evolutionmetagenomicsmitochondriaphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID28615286
PMCPMC5584316
OpenAlexW2624747403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.