ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017
Dr Google Is Here to Stay but Health Care Professionals Are Still Valued: An Analysis of Health Care Consumers' Internet Navigation Support Preferences.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of the Method of Delivering Electronic Health Behavior Change Interventions in Survivors of Cancer on Engagement, Health Behaviors, and Health Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Physiotherapists' Use of Web-Based Information Resources to Fulfill Their Information Needs During a Theoretical Examination: Randomized Crossover Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Evolving Health Information-Seeking Behavior in the Context of Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Alexa: Interview Study Using the Think-Aloud Protocol.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Generative AI as Third Agent: Large Language Models and the Transformation of the Clinician-Patient Relationship.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- From E-Patients to AI Patients: The Tidal Wave Empowering Patients, Redefining Clinical Relationships, and Transforming Care.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- The People's Review protocol: planning an innovative study powered by the public.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- Article
- An interpretable knee replacement risk assessment system for osteoarthritis patients.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2024Article
- Become a Health Literacy Champion: Strategies to Promote Health Literacy in Athletic Training.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- An Extraordinary Voice Expressed Through Humor: A Tribute to Casey Quinlan.Journal of participatory medicine · 2023Article
- Dr. Google: Physicians-The Web-Patients Triangle: Digital Skills and Attitudes towards e-Health Solutions among Physicians in South Eastern Poland-A Cross-Sectional Study in a Pre-COVID-19 Era.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Miscarriage Australia: the use of a human centered design approach to design and develop a website for those affected by miscarriage.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Ability of Emotional Regulation and Control as a Stress Predictor in Healthcare Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Transitioning to digital first line intervention - validation of a brief online screener for early identification of a suspected eating disorder: study protocol.Journal of eating disorders · 2020Article
- Googling for Ticks and Borreliosis in Germany: Nationwide Google Search Analysis From 2015 to 2018.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Core and adjunctive interventions for osteoarthritis: efficacy and models for implementation.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2020Review
- Community-based online survey on seeking care and information for lower limb pain and injury in Australia: an observational study.BMJ open · 2020Observational
- The Association Between Health Information Seeking on the Internet and Physician Visits (The Seventh Tromsø Study - Part 4): Population-Based Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Utilization of Health Care Resources by the Amish of a Rural County in Nebraska.Journal of community health · 2019Article
- Examining the Interaction Between Medical Information Seeking Online and Understanding: Exploratory Study.JMIR cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Internet offers great opportunities for consumers to be informed about their health. However, concerns have been raised regarding its impact on the traditional health consumer-health professional relationship. Our recent survey of 400 Australian adults identified that over half of consumers required some form of navigational support in locating appropriate Web-based health information. We propose that support provided by health professionals would be preferred by consumers; this preference is regardless of whether consumers have a need for navigational support. Secondary analysis of the survey dataset is presented here to quantify consumer-reported support preferences and barriers when navigating Web-based health information.
objectiveWe aimed to quantitatively identify consumers' support preferences for locating Web-based health information and their barriers when navigating Web-based health information. We also aimed to compare such preferences and barriers between consumers identified as needing and not needing support when locating Web-based health information.
methodsChi-square (χ
resultsOf the 400 respondents, the most preferred mode of navigational support was involvement of health professionals; this was reported by participants identified as needing and not needing navigational support. While there was a significant difference between groups, the degree of association was small (χ
conclusionsDespite concerns in the literature that the popularity of the Internet could compromise the health consumer-health professional relationship, our findings suggest the contrary. Our findings showed that health professionals were found to be the most commonly preferred mode of navigational support, even among consumers classified as not needing navigational support. Further research into how health professionals could assist consumers with Web-based health information seeking could strengthen the health consumer-health professional relationship amidst the growing use of "Dr Google."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.