Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615079›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2017

Patterns of objectively measured sedentary time in 10- to 12-year-old Belgian children: an observational study within the ENERGY-project.

Maïté Verloigne, Nicola D Ridgers, Mai Chinapaw, Teatske M Altenburg, Elling Bere, Wendy Van Lippevelde, Greet Cardon, Johannes Brug, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 SOCIAL ISOLATION IN BRAZIL: EFFECTS ON THE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ROUTINE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. maite.verloigne@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9048-3821
Nicola D RidgersDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Burwood, Australia.
Mai ChinapawDepartment of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Teatske M AltenburgDepartment of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elling BereDepartment of Public Health, Sport and Nutrition, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Wendy Van LippeveldeDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Greet CardonDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Johannes BrugDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ilse De BourdeaudhuijDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Amsterdam Public Health · NLGhent University · BEDeakin University · AUResearch Foundation - Flanders · BEUniversity of Agder · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined the frequency of and differences in sedentary bouts of different durations and the total time spent in sedentary bouts on a weekday, a weekend day, during school hours, during after-school hours and in the evening period in a sample of 10- to 12-year-old Belgian children.

methodsAccelerometer data were collected as part of the ENERGY-project in Belgium (n = 577, 10.9 ± 0.7 years, 53% girls) in 2011. Differences in total sedentary time, sedentary bouts of 2-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30 and ≥30 min and total time accumulated in those bouts were examined on a weekday, a weekend day, during school hours, during after-school hours and in the evening period, using multilevel analyses in MLwiN 2.22.

resultsMore than 60% of the participants' waking time was spent sedentary. Children typically engaged in short sedentary bouts of 2-5 and 5-10 min, which contributed almost 50% towards their total daily sedentary time. Although the differences were very small, children engaged in significantly fewer sedentary bouts of nearly all durations during after-school hours compared to during school hours and in the evening period. Children also engaged in significantly fewer sedentary bouts of 5-10, 10-20, and 20-30 min per hour on a weekend day than on a weekday.

conclusionsAlthough primary school children spend more than 60% of their waking time sedentary, they generally engaged in short sedentary bouts. Children's sedentary bouts were slightly longer on weekdays, particularly during school hours and in the evening period, although the differences were very small. These results suggest that in this age group, interventions focusing on reducing total sedentary time rather than interrupting prolonged sedentary time are needed.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorExerciseSedentary BehaviorAccelerometryBelgiumChildFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalSchoolsTime FactorsAccelerometerChildrenSedentary boutsSedentary time

Identifiers

PMID28615079
PMCPMC5471712
OpenAlexW2625221194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.