Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615050›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Conceptualizing physical activity parenting practices using expert informed concept mapping analysis.

Louise C Mâsse, Teresia M O'Connor, Andrew W Tu, Sheryl O Hughes, Mark R Beauchamp, Tom Baranowski, Physical Activity Parenting Expert Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise C MâsseBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, F508-4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada. lmasse@bcchr.ubc.ca.
Teresia M O'ConnorUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, CNRC-2034 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Andrew W TuBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, F508-4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Sheryl O HughesUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, CNRC-2034 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mark R BeauchampUniversity of British Columbia, Rm 122 War Memorial Gymnasium, 6081 University Boulevard Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tom BaranowskiUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, CNRC-2034 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Physical Activity Parenting Expert Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents are widely recognized as playing a central role in the development of child behaviors such as physical activity. As there is little agreement as to the dimensions of physical activity-related parenting practices that should be measured or how they should be operationalized, this study engaged experts to develop an integrated conceptual framework for assessing parenting practices that influence multiple aspects of 5 to 12 year old children's participation in physical activity. The ultimate goal of this study is to inform the development of an item bank (repository of calibrated items) aimed at measuring physical activity parenting practices.

methodsTwenty four experts from 6 countries (Australia, Canada, England, Scotland, the Netherlands, & United States (US)) sorted 77 physical activity parenting practice concepts identified from our previously published synthesis of the literature (74 measures) and survey of Canadian and US parents. Concept Mapping software was used to conduct the multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis and a cluster analysis of the MDS solution of the Expert's sorting which was qualitatively reviewed and commented on by the Experts.

resultsThe conceptual framework includes 12 constructs which are presented using three main domains of parenting practices (neglect/control, autonomy support, and structure). The neglect/control domain includes two constructs: permissive and pressuring parenting practices. The autonomy supportive domain includes four constructs: encouragement, guided choice, involvement in child physical activities, and praises/rewards for their child's physical activity. Finally, the structure domain includes six constructs: co-participation, expectations, facilitation, modeling, monitoring, and restricting physical activity for safety or academic concerns.

conclusionThe concept mapping analysis provided a useful process to engage experts in re-conceptualizing physical activity parenting practices and identified key constructs to include in measures of physical activity parenting. While the constructs identified ought to be included in measures of physical activity parenting practices, it will be important to collect data among parents to further validate the content of these constructs. In conclusion, the method provided a roadmap for developing an item bank that captures key facets of physical activity parenting and ultimately serves to standardize how we operationalize measures of physical activity parenting.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild RearingExerciseParent-Child RelationsParentingParentsAdultAustraliaCanadaChildEnglandFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsScotlandChildrenConcept mappingMeasurementParenting practicesPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID28615050
PMCPMC5471850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.