Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28615036›Full record

ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2017

Predictors of the response to etanercept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis without systemic manifestations within 12 months: results of an open-label, prospective study conducted at the National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health, Russia.

Ekaterina I Alexeeva, Leyla S Namazova-Baranova, Tatyana M Bzarova, Saniya I Valieva, Rina V Denisova, Tatyana V Sleptsova, Kseniya B Isaeva, Alexandra M Chomahidze, Nikolay I Taibulatov, Anna N Fetisova and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enthesitis-related arthritis: current perspectives.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ekaterina I AlexeevaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. alekatya@yandex.ru.
Leyla S Namazova-BaranovaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana M BzarovaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Saniya I ValievaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Rina V DenisovaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana V SleptsovaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Kseniya B IsaevaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra M ChomahidzeFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay I TaibulatovFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Anna N FetisovaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Anna V KarasevaFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandr A BaranovFederal State Autonomous Institution "National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health" Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of etanercept treatment and to identify predictors of response to therapy within 12 months in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) without systemic manifestations.

methodsA total of 197 juvenile patients were enrolled in this study. Response to therapy was assessed using the ACRPedi 30/50/70/90 criteria, the Wallace criteria, and the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 71 (JADAS-71). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential baseline factors associated with treatment response in different JIA categories.

resultsOne year after treatment initiation, 179 (90.9%) patients achieved ACRPedi30; 177 (89.8%) patients achieved ACRPedi50; 168 (85.3%) patients achieved ACRPedi70; and 135 (68.5%) patients achieved ACRPedi90 response. A total of 132 (67.0%) and 92 (46.7%) patients achieved inactive disease according to the Wallace criteria and the JADAS-71 cut-off point, respectively. Excellent response (achieving ACRPedi90 and clinically inactive disease according both to the Wallace criteria and the JADAS71 cut-off point) was associated with persistent oligoarticular JIA category, shorter disease duration before the start of etanercept, a lower number of DMARDs used before the introduction of etanercept, a lower number of joints with limited motion, and lower C-reactive protein at baseline. Poor response (failure to achieve ACR 70 or active disease according to both the Wallace criteria and JADAS71 even when ACR 70 was achieved) was associated with the polyarticular or enthesitis-related JIA categories, higher disease duration before the start of etanercept, and older age at disease onset.

conclusionAlmost half (45.7%) of the patients who initiated etanercept treatment achieved an excellent response (inactive disease and ACRPedi90) after 1 year. What may be novel is our finding that the response to etanercept therapy was strongly associated with the JIA category. The response to etanercept therapy was also associated with the disease duration before the start of etanercept treatment.

Indexed as

Arthritis, JuvenileEtanerceptAge of OnsetAntirheumatic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient AcuityRange of Motion, ArticularRussiaSeverity of Illness IndexAntirheumatic AgentsC-Reactive ProteinEtanerceptAnti-TNF treatmentEtanerceptFactors associated with treatment responseJuvenile idiopathic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID28615036
PMCPMC5471744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.