Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28614805›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2017

Assessing rejection-related disease in kidney transplant biopsies based on archetypal analysis of molecular phenotypes.

Jeff Reeve, Georg A Böhmig, Farsad Eskandary, Gunilla Einecke, Carmen Lefaucheur, Alexandre Loupy, Philip F Halloran, MMDx-Kidney study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01299168 (Multi-centric Observational Study to Analyse the Diagnostic Molecular Features in the Clinical Setting of Kidney Allograft Biopsies), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01299168 recruitingnot on this map

Multi-centric Observational Study to Analyse the Diagnostic Molecular Features in the Clinical Setting of Kidney Allograft Biopsies

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2011 to 2028Enrolled500ConditionsValidation Study of Molecular Diagnostic System, Development of Reporting System for Molecular Diagnosis, Incorporate Molecular Diagnosis Into Diagnostic Standards
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring for early diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a randomized trial.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A Randomized Trial of Bortezomib in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. BHLHE40 Orchestrates Effector Tissue-Resident Memory CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeff ReeveAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Alberta, Canada.
Georg A BöhmigDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Farsad EskandaryDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gunilla EineckeDepartment of Nephrology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Carmen LefaucheurParis Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris, France.
Alexandre LoupyParis Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris, France.
Philip F HalloranAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Alberta, Canada.
MMDx-Kidney study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional histologic diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplants has limited repeatability due to its inherent requirement for subjective assessment of lesions, in a rule-based system that does not acknowledge diagnostic uncertainty. Molecular phenotyping affords opportunities for increased precision and improved disease classification to address the limitations of conventional histologic diagnostic systems and quantify levels of uncertainty. Microarray data from 1,208 kidney transplant biopsies were collected prospectively from 13 centers. Cross-validated classifier scores predicting the presence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and 5 related histologic lesions were generated using supervised machine learning methods. These scores were used as input for archetypal analysis, an unsupervised method similar to cluster analysis, to examine the distribution of molecular phenotypes related to rejection. Six archetypes were generated: no rejection, TCMR, 3 associated with ABMR (early-stage, fully developed, and late-stage), and mixed rejection (TCMR plus early-stage ABMR). Each biopsy was assigned 6 scores, one for each archetype, representing a probabilistic assessment of that biopsy based on its rejection-related molecular properties. Viewed as clusters, the archetypes were similar to existing histologic Banff categories, but there was 32% disagreement, much of it probably reflecting the "noise" in the current histologic assessment system. Graft survival was lowest for fully developed and late-stage ABMR, and it was better predicted by molecular archetype scores than histologic diagnoses. The results provide a system for precision molecular assessment of biopsies and a new standard for recalibrating conventional diagnostic systems.

Indexed as

NephrologyTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID28614805
PMCPMC5470931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.