ArticleJCI insight2017
Globalization and changing trends of biomedical research output.
Article in JCI insight, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrity in Radiation Oncology Research: A Systematic Review of Retracted Studies, Retraction Notices, and Their Impact on the Field.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Trends in the studies of pharmacoresistant epilepsy- a review based on literature analysis (2015-2025).Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 cited studies related to acromioclavicular joint instability.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Global collaborative research in metabolic and bariatric surgery (GCRMBS): current status and directions for the future.BMC surgery · 2024Review
- Participant diversity in ACER: 2010-2022.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2024Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-influential papers in the field of anti-diabetic drugs.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Global Research Trends in the Latarjet Procedure: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Procedural and Methodological Quality in Preclinical Stroke Research-A Cohort Analysis of the Rat MCAO Model Comparing Periods Before and After the Publication of STAIR/ARRIVE.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- The Top 50 Most-Cited Knee Arthroscopy Studies.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2021Review
- Are all voices heard in the COVID-19 debate?Scientometrics · 2021Article
- Regional variations in adverse event reporting rates and ACR responses in placebo/standard-of-care arms of rheumatoid arthritis trials.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Observational
- Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Research: A Scoping Review.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- CORRClinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017Article
- The argument for diversifying the NIH grant portfolio.Molecular biology of the cell · 2017Article
- Global research in arthroscopy of the anterior cruciate ligament: A bibliometric and visualized study.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The US continues to lead the world in research and development (R&D) expenditures, but there is concern that stagnation in federal support for biomedical research in the US could undermine the leading role the US has played in biomedical and clinical research discoveries. As a readout of research output in the US compared with other countries, assessment of original research articles published by US-based authors in ten clinical and basic science journals during 2000 to 2015 showed a steady decline of articles in high-ranking journals or no significant change in mid-ranking journals. In contrast, publication output originating from China-based investigators, in both high- and mid-ranking journals, has steadily increased commensurate with significant growth in R&D expenditures. These observations support the current concerns of stagnant and year-to-year uncertainty in US federal funding of biomedical research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.