Observational studyMedicine2017
MELD score as a predictor of mortality, length of hospital stay, and disease burden: A single-center retrospective study in 39,323 inpatients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introducing the TOP framework: a novel phenotyping solution for collaborative phenotype algorithm development and application.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- L-FABP as a Potential Biomolecular Marker of Liver Graft Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Association of Estimated Plasma Volume Status With Invasive Hemodynamics and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of Calculated Liver Scores for Long-Term Outcome in 423 Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.Cancers · 2024Article
- Waiting for a Liver Transplant in New Mexico; Understanding the State's Multi-layered Adversity.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2024Article
- Article
- Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparing Jaffe and Enzymatic Methods for Creatinine Measurement at Various Icterus Levels and Their Impacts on Liver Transplant Allocation.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Serum Nitric Oxide Level Serves as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in ACLF Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Liver Disease is Associated with Increased Mortality and Major Morbidity After Infra-Inguinal Bypass but not After Endovascular Intervention.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2021Article
- Post-operative outcomes for patients with liver-related ascites undergoing non-emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Diastolic Dysfunction Is a Predictor of Poor Survival in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis.International journal of hepatology · 2021Article
- Identification of HO-1 as a novel biomarker for graft acute cellular rejection and prognosis prediction after liver transplantation.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- The detrimental potential of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The laboratory-based model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score reflects the function of the kidney, liver, and extrinsic coagulation pathway and might be used as a general prognostic tool for the assessment of patients. We therefore aimed to investigate a potential association of the MELD score with mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and disease burden in a general patient population.We performed a retrospective observational study at a tertiary referral center. From January 2012 through December 2013, all consecutive inpatients aged 18 years were eligible for the study; patients with missing MELD parameters on hospital admission and/or treatments influencing the international normalized ratio, that is, novel oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists, were excluded. The MELD score on hospital admission was calculated retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital all-cause mortality; secondary outcome measures were LOS and the number of comorbidities.A total of 39,323 inpatients were included in the final analysis. On admission, MELD scores of 15 to 19, 20 to 29, and ≥30 points (reference <15 points) showed increased hazard ratios (HRs) for in-hospital mortality in uni- and multivariable analysis with an adjusted HR of 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.81-3.49; P < .001), 2.70 (95% CI, 1.89-3.84; P < .001), and 8.00 (95% CI, 3.91-16.39; P < .001), respectively. Increased MELD scores of 15 to 19, 20 to 29, and ≥30 points were positively associated with LOS and the number of comorbidities in uni- and multivariable analysis.In our study population consisting of adult inpatients, the MELD score on hospital admission was significantly associated with mortality, LOS, and the number of comorbidities. We suggest to prospectively validate the MELD score in inpatients as part of clinical decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.