Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28614206›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2017

Prognostic Significance of New AJCC Tumor Stage in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Deyali Chatterjee, Matthew H Katz, Wai Chin Foo, Manonmani Sundar, Hua Wang, Gauri R Varadhachary, Robert A Wolff, Jeffrey E Lee, Anirban Maitra, Jason B Fleming and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Tumor Size Differences Between Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound and Postoperative Pathology for Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predict Patient Outcome.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinicopathological correlation of radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size and tumor volume for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Fibrotic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Predicts Survival in Pancreatic Cancer and Is Measurable with Collagen-Targeted Molecular MRI.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deyali ChatterjeeDepartments of *Pathology †Surgical Oncology ‡Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Matthew H Katz
Wai Chin Foo
Manonmani Sundar
Hua Wang
Gauri R Varadhachary
Robert A Wolff
Jeffrey E Lee
Anirban Maitra
Jason B Fleming
Asif Rashid
Huamin Wang
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSociety of Surgical Oncology · US

Funding

Clinical Significance of Pancreatic Cancer Differentiation and DedifferentiationR01CA195651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WANG, HUAMIN · 2015 to 2021
$1.8M
Novel Signaling Pathways Regulating Pancreatic Cancer PathogenesisR01CA196941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WANG, HUAMIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195651NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Joint Committee for Cancer has adopted a size-based T stage system (eighth edition) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), defined as follows: pT1≤2 cm (pT1a≤0.5 cm, pT1b>0.5 and<1 cm, and pT1c 1-2 cm); pT2>2 and ≤4 cm; and pT3> 4 cm. However, the prognostic value of this new T staging system has not been validated in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) after neoadjuvant therapy. In this study, we analyzed 398 PDAC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and PD at our institution from 1999 to 2012. The results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival. The new T stage correlated with lymph nodes metastasis (P<0.001), tumor response grade (P<0.001), disease-free survival (DFS, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS, P<0.001). None of the patients with ypT0 had recurrence or died of disease. Among the patients with ypT1 disease, patients with ypT1a and ypT1b had better DFS (P=0.046) and OS (P=0.03) than those with ypT1c. However, there was no significant difference in either DFS or OS between ypT1c and ypT2 or between ypT2 and ypT3 groups (P>0.05). In multivariate analysis, new ypT3 stage was associated with shorter OS (P=0.04), but not DFS (P=0.16). Our results show that the new ypT stage better stratify survival than the ypT stage in American Joint Committee for Cancer seventh edition for PDAC patients who received PD after neoadjuvant therapy, and that tumor size cutoff of 1.0 cm work better for ypT2 than the proposed tumor size cutoff of 2.0 cm in this group of patients.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPancreaticoduodenectomyAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID28614206
PMCPMC5527751
OpenAlexW2627085052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.