ArticleMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy2017
Clinical Significance of
Article in Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostatic incidental uptake on PET/CT: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and malignancy risk.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Nuclear medicine imaging modalities to detect incidentalomas and their impact on patient management: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Pulmonary Involvement Mimicking Pneumonia: Findings onMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026Article
- The risk of prostate cancer on incidental finding of an avid prostate uptake on 2-deoxy-2-[Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of incidental focal uptake of
methodsA retrospective review of 3122 consecutive male patients who underwent
resultsIncidental
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.