Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28613127›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2017

Differences in medical services in Nordic general practice: a comparative survey from the QUALICOPC study.

Torunn Bjerve Eide, Jørund Straand, Cecilia Björkelund, Elise Kosunen, Ofeigur Thorgeirsson, Peter Vedsted, Elin Olaug Rosvold

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality improvement work in general practice; a Norwegian focus group study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in Norwegian general practice.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Danish general practice under threat?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Torunn Bjerve Eidea Department of General Practice , Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
Jørund Straanda Department of General Practice , Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
Cecilia Björkelundb Department of Primary Health Care , Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Elise Kosunenc School of Medicine , University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland.
Ofeigur Thorgeirssone Grafarvogur Primary Care Centre , Reykjavik , Iceland.
Peter Vedstedf Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
Elin Olaug Rosvolda Department of General Practice , Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
University of Oslo · NOAarhus University · DKTampere University · FIUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aim to describe medical services provided by Nordic general practitioners (GPs), and to explore possible differences between the countries. DESIGN AND

settingWe did a comparative analysis of selected data from the Nordic part of the study Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC). SUBJECTS: A total of 875 Nordic GPs (198 Norwegian, 80 Icelandic, 97 Swedish, 212 Danish and 288 Finnish) answered identical questionnaires regarding their practices.

main outcome measuresThe GPs indicated which equipment they used in practice, which procedures that were carried out, and to what extent they were involved in treatment/follow-up of a selection of diagnoses.

resultsThe Danish GPs performed minor surgical procedures significantly less frequent than GPs in all other countries, although they inserted IUDs significantly more often than GPs in Iceland, Sweden and Finland. Finnish GPs performed a majority of the medical procedures more frequently than GPs in the other countries. The GPs in Iceland reported involvement in a more narrow selection of conditions than the GPs in the other countries. The Finnish GPs had more advanced technical equipment than GPs in all other Nordic countries.

conclusionsGPs in all Nordic countries are well equipped and offer a wide range of medical services, yet with a substantial variation between countries. There was no clear pattern of GPs in one country doing consistently more procedures, having consistently more equipment and treating a larger diversity of medical conditions than GPs in the other countries. However, structural factors seemed to affect the services offered.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFamily PracticeAdultAgedEquipment and SuppliesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMinor Surgical ProceduresPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality of Health CareScandinavian and Nordic CountriesdiagnosisequipmentGeneral practicehealth servicesNordic countriesOrganisation and AdministrationproceduresQUALICOPC

Identifiers

PMID28613127
PMCPMC5499315
OpenAlexW2625665140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.