Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28612468›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2018

Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.

Richard M Hoffman, Stephen K Van Den Eeden, Kimberly M Davis, Tania Lobo, George Luta, Jun Shan, David Aaronson, David F Penson, Amethyst D Leimpeter, Kathryn L Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Patient participation in treatment decision-making of prostate cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer living in a remote area: A cross-sectional, observational study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard M HoffmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4714-7726
Stephen K Van Den EedenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Kimberly M DavisCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Tania LoboDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
George LutaDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Jun ShanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
David AaronsonDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Permanente East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.
David F PensonDepartment of Urological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amethyst D LeimpeterDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Kathryn L TaylorCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
TREATMENT DECISIONS AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCERR01CA155578 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, KATHRYN L, VAN DEN EEDEN, STEPHEN K. · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize decision-making processes and outcomes among men expressing early-treatment preferences for low-risk prostate cancer.

methodsWe conducted telephone surveys of men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer in 2012 to 2014. We analyzed subjects who had discussed prostate cancer treatment with a clinician and expressed a treatment preference. We asked about decision-making processes, including physician discussions, prostate-cancer knowledge, decision-making styles, treatment preference, and decisional conflict. We compared the responses across treatment groups with χ

resultsParticipants (n = 761) had a median age of 62; 82% were white, 45% had a college education, and 35% had no comorbidities. Surveys were conducted at a median of 25 days (range 9-100) post diagnosis. Overall, 55% preferred active surveillance (AS), 26% preferred surgery, and 19% preferred radiotherapy. Participants reported routinely considering surgery, radiotherapy, and AS. Most were aware of their low-risk status (97%) and the option for AS (96%). However, men preferring active treatment (AT) were often unaware of treatment complications, including sexual dysfunction (23%) and urinary complications (41%). Most men (63%) wanted to make their own decision after considering the doctor's opinion, and about 90% reported being sufficiently involved in the treatment discussion. Men preferring AS had slightly more uncertainty about their decisions than those preferring AT.

conclusionsSubjects were actively engaged in decision making and considered a range of treatments. However, we found knowledge gaps about treatment complications among those preferring AT and slightly more decisional uncertainty among those preferring AS, suggesting the need for early decision support.

Indexed as

Decision MakingWatchful WaitingAgedConflict, PsychologicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceProstatic NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintydecision makingneoplasm stagingprostatectomyprostatic neoplasmsradiotherapywatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID28612468
PMCPMC5849389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.