ArticlePsycho-oncology2018
Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The lived experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Pooled it
- Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Men's experiences of decision-making in life-prolonging treatments of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - wishing for a process adapted to personal preferences: a prospective interview study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Treatment decision-making and treatment experiences in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Eliciting men's preferences for decision-making relative to treatments of localized prostate cancer with a good or moderate prognosis.World journal of urology · 2023Review
- Patient participation in treatment decision-making of prostate cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Article
- Treatment decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer living in a remote area: A cross-sectional, observational study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?Molecular oncology · 2020Review
- Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Attitude towards active surveillance: a cross-sectional survey among patients with uroandrological disorders.BMJ open · 2018Observational
- Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.Cancer · 2017Article
- Physicians' Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Treatment Decision-making Process for Men With Low-risk Prostate Cancer.Urology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize decision-making processes and outcomes among men expressing early-treatment preferences for low-risk prostate cancer.
methodsWe conducted telephone surveys of men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer in 2012 to 2014. We analyzed subjects who had discussed prostate cancer treatment with a clinician and expressed a treatment preference. We asked about decision-making processes, including physician discussions, prostate-cancer knowledge, decision-making styles, treatment preference, and decisional conflict. We compared the responses across treatment groups with χ
resultsParticipants (n = 761) had a median age of 62; 82% were white, 45% had a college education, and 35% had no comorbidities. Surveys were conducted at a median of 25 days (range 9-100) post diagnosis. Overall, 55% preferred active surveillance (AS), 26% preferred surgery, and 19% preferred radiotherapy. Participants reported routinely considering surgery, radiotherapy, and AS. Most were aware of their low-risk status (97%) and the option for AS (96%). However, men preferring active treatment (AT) were often unaware of treatment complications, including sexual dysfunction (23%) and urinary complications (41%). Most men (63%) wanted to make their own decision after considering the doctor's opinion, and about 90% reported being sufficiently involved in the treatment discussion. Men preferring AS had slightly more uncertainty about their decisions than those preferring AT.
conclusionsSubjects were actively engaged in decision making and considered a range of treatments. However, we found knowledge gaps about treatment complications among those preferring AT and slightly more decisional uncertainty among those preferring AS, suggesting the need for early decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.