Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28612325›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

Stages of Change for Mammography Among Mexican Women and a Decisional Balance Comparison Across Countries.

Ana María Salinas-Martínez, David Emmanuel Castañeda-Vásquez, Norma Guadalupe García-Morales, Norma Edith Oliva-Sosa, Laura Hermila de-la-Garza-Salinas, Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha, José Manuel Ramírez-Aranda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Never Screened: Understanding Breast Cancer Nonadherence in Puerto Rico.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2021
    Article
  3. Inconsistent Mammography Perceptions and Practice among Women of Over 40 Years in IranAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana María Salinas-MartínezEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Ave. Lincoln S/N esquina Ma. Jesús Candia. Col. Valle Verde, 2° sector, Monterrey, N.L., CP 64360, Mexico. amsalinasmartinez@gmail.com.
David Emmanuel Castañeda-VásquezSchool of Public Health and Nutrition, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Norma Guadalupe García-MoralesSchool of Public Health and Nutrition, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Norma Edith Oliva-SosaEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Ave. Lincoln S/N esquina Ma. Jesús Candia. Col. Valle Verde, 2° sector, Monterrey, N.L., CP 64360, Mexico.
Laura Hermila de-la-Garza-SalinasHealth Planning Division, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Georgina Mayela Núñez-RochaSchool of Public Health and Nutrition, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
José Manuel Ramírez-ArandaSchool of Medicine, Family Medicine Department, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analysis of the adoption of secondary preventive behaviors is significant in regions with disparities in mammography use and breast cancer survival. Therefore, we determined the cognitive factors and the degree to which they differentiate stages of change in mammography among Mexican women. We also compared the decisional balance performance at Mexico, Switzerland, South Korea, and the USA. A cross-sectional study was designed for women in the stages of precontemplation (n = 240), contemplation (n = 243), action (n = 205), maintenance (n = 311), and relapse (n = 348). We only considered those ≥40 years with no cancer history. We measured the pros, cons, and self-efficacy, among other components. The decisional balance was estimated, and the result was transformed into T-scores. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with multinomial logistic regression using precontemplation as the reference group. The decisional balance distinguished stages partially: in contemplation, the OR was 1.26 (95%CI 1.08, 1.47) and in maintenance, 1.34 (95%CI 1.13, 1.59); in action and relapse, the statistical significance was marginal (p < 0.10). The decisional balance T-score performance registered variations among countries. Additionally, the effect of self-efficacy progressively ascended from contemplation to action and maintenance (OR = 1.29 [95%CI 1.05, 1.58], 1.53 [95%CI 1.20, 1.96], and 2.48 [95%CI 1.82, 3.39], respectively). Furthermore, risk perception and severity did not have an effect on stages of change among Mexican women. Recognition of what provokes action in a population is a key factor in the efficacy of screening programs. Variations among countries highlight the necessity for importance of investigating cognitive determinants for mammography in specific areas.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMammographyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMexicoMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSelf EfficacySwitzerlandUnited StatesBreast cancerMammographyStages of changeTranstheoretical model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.