Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28612269›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel Monotherapy: An Updated Literature Review.

Tore B Stage, Troels K Bergmann, Deanna L Kroetz

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. June 2025 Letters to the Editor.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tore B StageDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. tstage@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4698-4389
Troels K BergmannDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Deanna L KroetzDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Pharmacogenomics of Microtubule Targeting AgentsR01CA192156 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KROETZ, DEANNA L · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paclitaxel is an anticancer agent efficacious in the treatment of ovarian, breast, and lung cancer. Due to a strong link between the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel, we reviewed the literature on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. Systematic data mining was performed to extract the maximum concentration (C

Indexed as

AlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlycerolHumansInfusions, IntravenousNeoplasmsNonlinear DynamicsPaclitaxelSurface-Active AgentsTime Factors130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, Phytogeniccremophor ELGlycerolPaclitaxelSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID28612269
PMCPMC8572663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.