Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28612202›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

Management of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

M Salgado, S Arévalo, O Hernando, A Martínez, R Yaya, M Hidalgo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

M SalgadoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Orense, C/Ramon Puga Noguerol, 54, 32005, Orense, Spain. mercedes.salgado.fernandez@sergas.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-4972
S ArévaloDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, San Sebastián, Spain.
O HernandoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro and Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain.
A MartínezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
R YayaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
M HidalgoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Ourense · ESFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Del Mar · ESUniversity Hospital HM Puerta del Sur · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) requires confirmation, through imaging tests, of the unfeasibility of achieving a complete surgical resection, in the absence of metastatic spread. The increase in overall survival (OS), together with an appropriate symptom management is the therapeutic target in LAPC, maintaining an acceptable quality of life and, if possible, increasing the time until the appearance of metastasis. Chemoradiation (CRT) improves OS compared to best support treatment or radiotherapy (RT) but with greater toxicity. No significant increase in OS has been achieved with CRT when compared to chemotherapy (QT) alone in patients without disease progression after four months of treatment with QT. However, a significantly better local control, that is, a significant increase in the time to disease progression was associated with this approach. The greater effectiveness of the schemes FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine (Gem) + Nab-paclitaxel compared to gemcitabine alone, has been extrapolated from metastatic disease to LAPC, representing a possible alternative for patients with good performance status (ECOG 0-1). In the absence of randomized clinical trials, Gem is the standard treatment in LAPC. If disease control is achieved after 4-6 cycles of QT, the use of CRT for consolidation can be considered an option vs QT treatment maintenance. Capecitabine has a better toxicity profile and effectiveness compared to gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer. After local progression, and without evidence of metastases, treatment with RT or CRT, in selected patients, can support to maintain the regional disease control.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCombined Modality TherapyHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisQuality of LifeChemotherapyLocally advancedPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaRadiotherapyUnresectable

Identifiers

PMID28612202
OpenAlexW2625133359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.