Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28612158›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Long-term follow-up of the potential benefits of early nutritional intervention in adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a pilot randomised trial.

Kate Furness, Mary Anne Silvers, June Savva, Catherine E Huggins, Helen Truby, Terry Haines

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The relationship between nutritional status and prognosis in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients in palliative care: a prospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Does nutrition support during chemotherapy increase long-term survival of cancer patients? Lessons from the past and future perspectives.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate FurnessNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. kate.furness@monashhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4176-3050
Mary Anne SilversNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
June SavvaNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, 823-865 Centre Rd, Moorabbin, VIC, 3165, Australia.
Catherine E HugginsDepartment of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Helen TrubyDepartment of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Terry HainesAllied Health Research Unit, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Monash Health · AUMonash Medical Centre · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1069758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of all patients who participated in a pilot randomised trial of an early nutritional intervention for adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer. It also sought to identify factors that predicted patient mortality.

methodsAll participants (n = 21) who were randomised into the original study were followed for a maximum of 5 years and 2 months (final follow-up April 2016). The primary outcome measure was time from date of recruitment until date of death, ascertained by the Victorian Cancer Registry and/or Monash Health Scanned Medical Records. Secondary analyses were conducted to identify factors that adversely affected survival.

resultsAt the end of the follow-up period, three patients were alive in the nutrition intervention group whilst only two patients were living from the standard care group. Visual evaluation of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a possible survival benefit from being exposed to the intervention between 6 months and 1.4 years post-recruitment, though this benefit dissipated soon after. The intervention was not associated with increased survival in univariate analyses, but was after adjustment for other factors found to adversely impact on survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.12 (95% CI 0.02-0.72) p = 0.02). These factors were being a smoker (14.2 (1.43 to 140.67), p = 0.02); low baseline physical functioning (1.11 (1.01 to 1.21), p = 0.03); high baseline fatigue (1.09 (1.02-1.16), p = 0.007); and high baseline dyspnoea (1.08 (1.02-1.13), p = 0.003).

conclusionEarly and intensive nutrition intervention may increase the survival of people with upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurvival AnalysisDieteticsOesophageal cancerStomach cancerSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID28612158
OpenAlexW2625745731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.