ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2017
Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- PolyJet Three-dimensional-Printed Microchip Devices With Integrated Carbon Electrodes for Neurotransmitter Analysis.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
- Towards a 3D-Printed Millifluidic Device for Investigating Cellular Processes.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Use of 3D printing to integrate microchip electrophoresis with amperometric detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Leveraging the third dimension in microfluidic devices using 3D printing: no longer just scratching the surface.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- High-Resolution Additive Manufacturing of a Biodegradable Elastomer with A Low-Cost LCD 3D Printer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Impact of Beam Shape on Print Accuracy in Digital Light Processing Additive Manufacture.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Projection Micro-Stereolithography to Manufacture a Biocompatible Micro-Optofluidic Device for Cell Concentration Monitoring.Polymers · 2023Article
- Organoid-on-a-chip: Current challenges, trends, and future scope toward medicine.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- A review on inertial microfluidic fabrication methods.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Human gut epithelium features recapitulated in MINERVA 2.0 millifluidic organ-on-a-chip device.APL bioengineering · 2023Article
- Vat photopolymerization 3D printed microfluidic devices for organ-on-a-chip applications.Lab on a chip · 2023Review
- 3D-Printed Microfluidic Perfusion System for Parallel Monitoring of Hydrogel-Embedded Cell Cultures.Cells · 2023Article
- Cleanroom-Free Fabrication of Microneedles for Multimodal Drug Delivery.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023Article
- Direct 3D printed biocompatible microfluidics: assessment of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation and cytotoxic drug screening in a dynamic culture system.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- 3D printing in biotechnology-An insight into miniaturized and microfluidic systems for applications from cell culture to bioanalytics.Engineering in life sciences · 2022Review
- Techniques, challenges and future prospects for cell-based meat.Food science and biotechnology · 2022Review
- In-situ transfer vat photopolymerization for transparent microfluidic device fabrication.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Advances in multiplex electrical and optical detection of biomarkers using microfluidic devices.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- 3D-printed microchip electrophoresis device containing spiral electrodes for integrated capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Retinal organoids on-a-chip: a micro-millifluidic bioreactor for long-term organoid maintenance.Lab on a chip · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has generated considerable excitement in recent years regarding the extensive possibilities of this enabling technology. One area in which 3D printing has potential, not only for positive impact but also for substantial improvement, is microfluidics. To date many researchers have used 3D printers to make fluidic channels directed at point-of-care or lab-on-a-chip applications. Here, we look critically at the cross-sectional sizes of these 3D printed fluidic structures, classifying them as millifluidic (larger than 1 mm), sub-millifluidic (0.5-1.0 mm), large microfluidic (100-500 μm), or truly microfluidic (smaller than 100 μm). Additionally, we provide our prognosis for making 10-100-μm cross-section microfluidic features with custom-formulated resins and stereolithographic printers. Such 3D printed microfluidic devices for bioanalysis will accelerate research through designs that can be easily created and modified, allowing improved assays to be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.