Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611897›Full record

Trial reportThe western journal of emergency medicine2017

Feasibility of an ED-to-Home Intervention to Engage Patients: A Mixed-Methods Investigation.

Jessica R Schumacher, Barbara J Lutz, Allyson G Hall, Jesse M Pines, Andrea L Jones, Phyllis Hendry, Colleen Kalynych, Donna L Carden

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Predictors of Older Adult Adherence With Emergency Department Discharge Instructions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica R SchumacherUniversity of Florida, Department of Emergency Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Barbara J LutzUniversity of North Carolina-Wilmington, College of Health and Human Services, School of Nursing, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Allyson G HallUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Health Services Administration, Birmingham, Alabama.
Jesse M PinesThe George Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and Health Policy & Management, Washington, DC.
Andrea L JonesUniversity of North Carolina-Wilmington, College of Health and Human Services, School of Social Work, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Phyllis HendryUniversity of Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Colleen KalynychUniversity of Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Donna L CardenUniversity of Florida, Department of Emergency Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder, chronically ill patients with limited health literacy are often under-engaged in managing their health and turn to the emergency department (ED) for healthcare needs. We tested the impact of an ED-initiated coaching intervention on patient engagement and follow-up doctor visits in this high-risk population. We also explored patients' care-seeking decisions.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial and in-depth interviews in two EDs in northern Florida. Participants were chronically ill older ED patients with limited health literacy and Medicare as a payer source. Patients were assigned to an evidence-based coaching intervention (n= 35) or usual post-ED care (n= 34). Qualitative interviews (n=9) explored patients' reasons for ED use. We assessed average between-group differences in patient engagement over time with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) tool, using logistic regression and a difference-in-difference approach. Between-group differences in follow-up doctor visits were determined. We analyzed qualitative data using open coding and thematic analysis.

resultsPAM scores fell in both groups after the ED visit but fell significantly more in "usual care" (average decline -4.64) than "intervention" participants (average decline -2.77) (β=1.87, p=0.043). There were no between-group differences in doctor visits. Patients described well-informed reasons for ED visits including onset and severity of symptoms, lack of timely provider access, and immediate and comprehensive ED care.

conclusionThe coaching intervention significantly reduced declines in patient engagement observed after usual post-ED care. Patients reported well-informed reasons for ED use and will likely continue to make ED visits unless strategies, such as ED-initiated coaching, are implemented to help vulnerable patients better manage their health and healthcare.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth LiteracyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ParticipationSelf CareAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMentoringMiddle AgedQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28611897
PMCPMC5468082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.