Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611896›Full record

Trial reportThe western journal of emergency medicine2017

Pain Perception in Latino vs. Caucasian and Male vs. Female Patients: Is There Really a Difference?

Molly Aufiero, Holly Stankewicz, Shaila Quazi, Jeanne Jacoby, Jill Stoltzfus

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Medical Spanish Musculoskeletal and Dermatologic Educational Module.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Molly AufieroSt. Luke's University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Holly StankewiczSt. Luke's University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Shaila QuaziAria Health Network, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeanne JacobyLehigh Valley Health Network, Department of Emergency Medicine, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Jill StoltzfusSt. Luke's University Hospital, Research institute, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
St. Luke's Hospital · USAria - Jefferson Health · USLehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain is a common emergency department (ED) complaint. It is important to understand the differences in pain perception among different ethnic and demographic populations.

methodsWe applied a standardized painful stimulus to Caucasian and Latino adult patients to determine whether the level of pain reported differed depending on ethnicity (N=100; 50 Caucasian [C], 50 Latino [L] patients) and gender (N=100; 59 female, 41 male). Patients had an initial pain score of 0 or 1. A blood pressure cuff was inflated 20 mm HG above the patient's systolic blood pressure and held for three minutes. Pain scores, using both a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) and a five-point Likert scale, were taken at the point of maximal stimulus (2 minutes 50 seconds after inflation), and at one- and two-minute intervals post deflation.

resultsThere was a statistically significant difference between the Likert scale scores of Caucasian and Latino patients at 2min 50sec (mean rank: 4.35 [C] vs. 5.75 [L], p<0.01), but not on the VAS (mean value: 2.94 [C] vs. 3.46 [L], p=0.255). Women had a higher perception of pain than males at 2min 50sec on the VAS (mean value: 3.86 [F] vs. 2.24 [M], p<0.0001), and the Likert scale (mean rank: 5.63 [F] vs. 4.21 [M], p<0.01).

conclusionLatinos and women report greater pain with a standardized pain stimulus as compared to Caucasians and men.

Indexed as

AdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPain PerceptionProspective StudiesSex FactorsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID28611896
PMCPMC5468081
OpenAlexW2609917536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.