Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611813›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Insights into Host Cell Modulation and Induction of New Cells by the Corn Smut

Amey Redkar, Alexandra Matei, Gunther Doehlemann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A critical review on bioaerosols-dispersal of crop pathogenic microorganisms and their impact on crop yield.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Biotrophic Development ofThe Plant cell · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amey RedkarThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research ParkNorwich, United Kingdom.
Alexandra MateiBotanical Institute and Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BiocenterCologne, Germany.
Gunther DoehlemannBotanical Institute and Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BiocenterCologne, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences · DESainsbury Laboratory · GBUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many filamentous fungal pathogens induce drastic modulation of host cells causing abnormal infectious structures such as galls, or tumors that arise as a result of re-programming in the original developmental cell fate of a colonized host cell. Developmental consequences occur predominantly with biotrophic phytopathogens. This suggests that these host structures result as an outcome of efficient defense suppression and intimate fungal-host interaction to suit the pathogen's needs for completion of its infection cycle. This mini-review mainly summarizes host cell re-programming that occurs in the

Indexed as

cell-specificinductionmaizetumorUstilago maydis

Identifiers

PMID28611813
PMCPMC5447062
OpenAlexW2618585063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.