Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611463›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision.

Adrien Chopin, Dennis M Levi, Daphné Bavelier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrien ChopinEcole Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, CNRS, Département d'études cognitives, Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Paris, France. adrien.chopin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9289-7964
Dennis M LeviSchool of Optometry, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-8639
Daphné BavelierFaculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

A New Approach to Restoring Visual Acuity and Stereopsis in Adults with AmblyopiaR01EY020976 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BANKS, MARTIN S, BAVELIER, DAPHNE I · 2010 to 2020
$4.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to estimate the distance of objects from one's self and from each other is fundamental to a variety of behaviours from grasping objects to navigating. The main cue to distance, stereopsis, relies on the slight offsets between the images derived from our left and right eyes, also termed disparities. Here we ask whether the precision of stereopsis varies with professional experience with precise manual tasks. We measured stereo-acuities of dressmakers and non-dressmakers for both absolute and relative disparities. We used a stereoscope and a computerized test removing monocular cues. We also measured vergence noise and bias using the Nonius line technique. We demonstrate that dressmakers' stereoscopic acuities are better than those of non-dressmakers, for both absolute and relative disparities. In contrast, vergence noise and bias were comparable in the two groups. Two non-exclusive mechanisms may be at the source of the group difference we document: (i) self-selection or the fact that stereo-vision is functionally important to become a dressmaker, and (ii) plasticity, or the fact that training on demanding stereovision tasks improves stereo-acuity.

Indexed as

OccupationsSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28611463
PMCPMC5469751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.