Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611367›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The Hippocampus Sparing Volume Modulated Arc Therapy does not Influence Plan Quality on Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.

Wendong Gu, Qilin Li, Dan Xi, Ye Tian, Juncong Mo, Honglei Pei

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wendong GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Qilin LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Dan XiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China.
Juncong MoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Honglei PeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First Peoples' Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, 213003, China. hongleipei@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irradiation on hippocampus would lead to neuro-cognitive dysfunction in locally advanced nasopharyneal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients accepting radiotherapy. Our study here aimed to investigate if undergoing hippocampus sparing (HS) volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) would influence the plan quality in LA NPC patients. We designed three kinds of radiotherapeutic plans for 11 LA NPC patients: conventional VMAT (C-VMAT), HS-VMAT and HS intensity modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimator (HS-dMLC). And the dose distribution on targets and surrounding organs at risk (OAR) were carefully evaluated. We found out that the expected doses on hippocampus were significantly lowered in HS-VMAT (899 ± 378 cGy) and HS-dMLC (896 ± 321 cGy) as compared to C-VMAT (1518 ± 337 cGy, p < 0.05), but meaningless difference was presented on plan quality of targets (p > 0.05). Moreover, lower radiation doses on brain stem were observed in HS-VMAT plan in comparison with C-VMAT plan (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically meaningful diversities in the doses received by other OARs among all plans. Here we concluded that HS-VMAT presented promising advantages on protecting hipppcampus and brain stem as compared to C-VMAT and HS-dMLC, but enthusiastically had no effects on plan quality in LA-NPC patients.

Indexed as

HippocampusHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID28611367
PMCPMC5469746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.