Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611364›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Association of Polymorphisms in Pharmacogenetic Candidate Genes with Propofol Susceptibility.

Qi Zhong, Xiangdong Chen, Yan Zhao, Ru Liu, Shanglong Yao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04595591 (Effects of Propofol Titration at Different Speeds on Hemodynamics and Stress During General Anesthesia Induction), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04595591 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Propofol Titration at Different Speeds on Hemodynamics and Stress During General Anesthesia Induction

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanQing JinRan2020 to 2021Enrolled276ConditionsAnesthesia, General, HemodynamicsArms2mg/kg/min, 1mg/kg/min, 0.5mg/kg/min
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association BetweenPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Effects of Gene Variations ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-7784
Xiangdong ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China. xiangdongchen2013@163.com.
Yan ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China.
Ru LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421000, China.
Shanglong YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China.
Union Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of University of South China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant individual susceptibility to intravenous anesthetic propofol exists. The etiology of individual variability in the response to propofol may be influenced by genetic polymorphisms in metabolic and functional pathways. With current pharmacogenetics and modern molecular biology technologies, it is possible to study the influence of genetic polymorphisms on susceptibility to propofol. When inducing general anesthesia with intravenous propofol, high individual susceptibility to propofol was found. Using Sequenom MassARRAY single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping, we identified a mutation (rs6313) in the 5HT2A gene that was correlated to individual susceptibility to propofol effect-site concentration (Cep) and onset time of propofol induction. Carriers of the minor allele (G) of 5HT2A rs6313 required less propofol (20% decrease in Cep) and less time (40% decrease in onset time) to induce anesthesia. Moreover, associations were found between the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor SNP rs2279020 and the SCN9A SNP rs6746030 and the susceptibility of bispectral index (BIS) after propofol-induced anesthesia. In addition, dominant mutations in GABAA1 rs2279020, GABAA2 rs11503014, and CHRM2 rs1824024 were putatively associated with cardiovascular susceptibility to propofol anesthesia. No gene-gene interactions were found through a standardized measure of linkage disequilibrium and a multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis. Our results suggest that genetic polymorphisms related to mechanisms of propofol anesthesia are involved in propofol susceptibility.

Indexed as

Pharmacogenomic VariantsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAnesthetics, IntravenousDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPropofolReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AReceptors, GABA-AAnesthetics, IntravenousCHRM2 protein, humanNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPropofolReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AReceptors, GABA-ASCN9A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28611364
PMCPMC5469860
OpenAlexW2622755760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.