ArticleScientific reports2017
Chloroplast Genomic Resource of Paris for Species Discrimination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chloroplast genomics and nuclear ribosomal ITS phylogeny reveal pronounced cytonuclear discordance in Lycoris chunxiaoensis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Comparative plastome analysis of Schweinfurthia papilionacea and Schweinfurthia imbricata clarifying their taxonomic position in Lamiales.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of herbal medicine species of Lysimachia L. (Primulaceae) in Southern China using genome skimming.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic analysis and divergence time estimation of Lycium species in China based on the chloroplast genomes.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of 13 species of sect. Tuberculata Chang (Camellia L.): genomic features, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Kazakhstan tulips: comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes of four local and endangered species of the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- The complete chloroplast genome of Cicer reticulatum and comparative analysis against relative Cicer species.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genomes and Phylogenetic Relationships ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genome Determination ofGenes · 2023Article
- Plastid Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal the Taxonomic Position ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2022Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequencing and comparative analysis of threatened dragon trees Dracaena serrulata and Dracaena cinnabari.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The chloroplast genome of Farsetia hamiltonii Royle, phylogenetic analysis, and comparative study with other members of Clade C of Brassicaceae.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Chloroplast Genome of Lithocarpus dealbatus (Hook.f. & Thomson ex Miq.) Rehder Establishes Monophyletic Origin of the Species and Reveals Mutational Hotspots with Taxon Delimitation PotentialLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast for evolutionary relationship amongSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis of Complete Plastomes among Aristidoideae Species (Poaceae).Biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paris is famous in China for its medicinal value and has been included in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Inaccurate identification of these species could confound their effective exploration, conservation, and domestication. Due to the plasticity of the morphological characteristics, correct identification among Paris species remains problematic. In this regard, we report the complete chloroplast genome of P. thibetica and P. rugosa to develop highly variable molecular markers. Comparing three chloroplast genomes, we sought out the most variable regions to develop the best cpDNA barcodes for Paris. The size of Paris chloroplast genome ranged from 162,708 to 163,200 bp. A total of 134 genes comprising 81 protein coding genes, 45 tRNA genes and 8 rRNA genes were observed in all three chloroplast genomes. Eight rapidly evolving regions were detected, as well as the difference of simple sequence repeats (SSR) and repeat sequence. Two regions of the coding gene ycf1, ycf1a and ycf1b, evolved the quickest and were proposed as core barcodes for Paris. The complete chloroplast genome sequences provide more integrated and adequate information for better understanding the phylogenetic pattern and improving efficient discrimination during species identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.