Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611219›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Inhibitory engrams in perception and memory.

Helen C Barron, Tim P Vogels, Timothy E Behrens, Mani Ramaswami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cortical control of chandelier cells in neural codes.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. ICER-Controlled inhibitory plasticity of amygdala engram neurons regulates fear memory precision.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of GABANeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Neuroligin-2-Dependent Adhesion Defines a Molecular Checkpoint for Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Dynamical modeling of individual sensory reactivity and habituation learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Identification of somatostatinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Modular inhibitory coding in binary networks.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacological stimulation of infralimbic cortex after fear conditioning facilitates subsequent fear extinction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen C BarronThe Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; helen.barron@merton.ox.ac.uk tim.vogels@cncb.ox.ac.uk behrens@fmrib.ox.ac.uk mani.ramaswami@tcd.ie.
Tim P VogelsCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, United Kingdom; helen.barron@merton.ox.ac.uk tim.vogels@cncb.ox.ac.uk behrens@fmrib.ox.ac.uk mani.ramaswami@tcd.ie.
Timothy E BehrensThe Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; helen.barron@merton.ox.ac.uk tim.vogels@cncb.ox.ac.uk behrens@fmrib.ox.ac.uk mani.ramaswami@tcd.ie.
Mani RamaswamiTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Genetics and Microbiology and School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; helen.barron@merton.ox.ac.uk tim.vogels@cncb.ox.ac.uk behrens@fmrib.ox.ac.uk mani.ramaswami@tcd.ie.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT100000Wellcome Trust WT104765MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nervous systems use excitatory cell assemblies to encode and represent sensory percepts. Similarly, synaptically connected cell assemblies or "engrams" are thought to represent memories of past experience. Multiple lines of recent evidence indicate that brain systems create and use inhibitory replicas of excitatory representations for important cognitive functions. Such matched "inhibitory engrams" can form through homeostatic potentiation of inhibition onto postsynaptic cells that show increased levels of excitation. Inhibitory engrams can reduce behavioral responses to familiar stimuli, thereby resulting in behavioral habituation. In addition, by preventing inappropriate activation of excitatory memory engrams, inhibitory engrams can make memories quiescent, stored in a latent form that is available for context-relevant activation. In neural networks with balanced excitatory and inhibitory engrams, the release of innate responses and recall of associative memories can occur through focused disinhibition. Understanding mechanisms that regulate the formation and expression of inhibitory engrams in vivo may help not only to explain key features of cognition but also to provide insight into transdiagnostic traits associated with psychiatric conditions such as autism, schizophrenia, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

Indexed as

MemoryModels, NeurologicalPerceptionAnimalsAutistic DisorderCognitionHumansNerve NetSchizophreniaStress Disorders, Post-Traumaticcomputational modelinhibitory plasticitymemorynegative imageneural representation

Identifiers

PMID28611219
PMCPMC5495250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.