Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611148›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2017

Failure to account for practice effects leads to clinical misinterpretation of cognitive outcome following carotid endarterectomy.

Christopher J Marley, Andrew Sinnott, Judith E Hall, Gareth Morris-Stiff, Paul V Woodsford, Michael H Lewis, Damian M Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Assessing and validating reliable change across ADNI protocols.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2022
    Article
  6. Validating 1-Year Reliable Change Methods.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher J MarleyNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom.
Andrew SinnottNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom.
Judith E HallDepartment of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Gareth Morris-StiffDepartment of HPB Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Paul V WoodsfordDepartment of Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Wales, United Kingdom.
Michael H LewisNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom.
Damian M BaileyNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom damian.bailey@southwales.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-7095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure to remove stenotic atherosclerotic plaque from the origin of the carotid artery to reduce the risk of major stroke. Its impact on postoperative cognitive function (POCF) remains controversial; complicated, in part, by a traditional failure to account for practice effects incurred during consecutive psychometric testing. To address this for the first time, we performed psychometric testing (learning and memory, working memory, attention and information processing, and visuomotor coordination) in 15 male patients aged 68

Indexed as

CognitionNeuropsychological TestsAgedCarotid Artery DiseasesEndarterectomy, CarotidHumansMalePsychometricsCarotid endarterectomycerebral ischemia–reperfusioncognitive functionpostoperativepractice effects

Identifiers

PMID28611148
PMCPMC5471430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.