Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611111›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

The impact of interventions to improve the quality of prescribing and use of antibiotics in primary care patients with respiratory tract infections: a systematic review protocol.

Nahara Anani Martínez-González, Samuel Coenen, Andreas Plate, Annelies Colliers, Thomas Rosemann, Oliver Senn, Stefan Neuner-Jehle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nahara Anani Martínez-GonzálezInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Samuel CoenenDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Centre for General Practice, University of Antwerp - Campus Drie Eiken, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Andreas PlateInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Annelies ColliersDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Centre for General Practice, University of Antwerp - Campus Drie Eiken, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver SennInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan Neuner-JehleInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRespiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common reason for primary care (PC) consultations and for antibiotic prescribing and use. The majority of RTIs have a viral aetiology however, and antibiotic consumption is ineffective and unnecessary. Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes greatly to antibiotic resistance (ABR) leading to complications, increased adverse events, reconsultations and costs. Improving antibiotic consumption is thus crucial to containing ABR, which has become an urgent priority worldwide. We will systematically review the evidence about interventions aimed at improving the quality of antibiotic prescribing and use for acute RTI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include primary peer-reviewed and grey literature of studies conducted on in-hours and out-of-hours PC patients (adults and children): (1) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and/or cluster-RCTs evaluating the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of patient-targeted and clinician-targeted interventions and (2) RCTs and other study designs evaluating the effectiveness of public campaigns and regulatory interventions. We will search MEDLINE (EBSCOHost), EMBASE (Elsevier), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINHAL (EBSCOHost), PsychINFO (EBSCOHost), Web of Science, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences), TRIP (Turning Research Into Practice) and opensgrey.eu without language restriction. We will also search the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews. Primary outcomes include the rates of (guideline-recommended) antibiotics prescribed and/or used. Secondary outcomes include immediate or delayed use of antibiotics, and feasibility and acceptability outcomes. We will assess study eligibility and risk of bias, and will extract data. Data permitting, we will perform meta-analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is a systematic review protocol and so formal ethical approval is not required. We will not collect confidential, personal or primary data. The findings of this review will be disseminated at national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO trial (CRD42017035305).

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildData Interpretation, StatisticalDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansInappropriate PrescribingPrimary Health CareResearch DesignRespiratory Tract InfectionsSystematic Reviews as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute Respiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents UseAntibiotic UseInfectious DiseasesPrescriptionsPrudent Antibiotic UseQuality Of Antibiotic PrescribingQuality Of Antibiotic UseSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID28611111
PMCPMC5726136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.