Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28611058›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2017

Catarina I Gonçalves, José M Aragüés, Margarida Bastos, Luísa Barros, Nuno Vicente, Davide Carvalho, Manuel C Lemos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. High Population Frequency ofJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Catarina I GonçalvesCICS-UBIHealth Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
José M AragüésServiço de EndocrinologiaDiabetes e Metabolismo, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.
Margarida BastosServiço de EndocrinologiaDiabetes e Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Luísa BarrosServiço de EndocrinologiaDiabetes e Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Nuno VicenteServiço de EndocrinologiaDiabetes e Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Davide CarvalhoServiço de EndocrinologiaDiabetes e Metabolismo, Hospital de São João e Faculdade de Medicina do Porto, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Manuel C LemosCICS-UBIHealth Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal mclemos@fcsaude.ubi.pt.
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTUniversity of Beira Interior · PTHospital de Santa Maria · PTHospital de São João · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNormosmic congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (nCHH) is a rare disorder characterised by lack of pubertal development and infertility, due to deficient production, secretion or action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and, unlike Kallmann syndrome, is associated with a normal sense of smell. Mutations in the

designCross-sectional study of 40 unrelated patients with nCHH.

methodsPatients were screened for mutations in the

results

conclusionsThis study further expands the spectrum of known genetic defects associated with nCHH. Although

Indexed as

geneticsGNRHRgonadotropin-releasing hormonehypogonadotropic hypogonadismmutation

Identifiers

PMID28611058
PMCPMC5527354
OpenAlexW2626241671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.