Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28610949›Full record

ReviewAgeing research reviews2017

Calorie restriction in rodents: Caveats to consider.

Donald K Ingram, Rafael de Cabo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ageing research reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Liver, ageing and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald K IngramPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70809, United States. Electronic address: donald.ingram@pbrc.edu.
Rafael de CaboTranslational Gerontology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, United States. Electronic address: deCaboRa@grc.nia.nih.gov.
Louisiana State University · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Aging Intervention ProgramZIAAG000363 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI DE CABO, RAFAEL · 2009 to 2025
$9.0M
Calorie restriction and agingZIAAG000368 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI DE CABO, RAFAEL · 2009 to 2025
$6.9M
Aging and CR effects on the Plasma Membrane Redox SystemZIAAG000362 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI DE CABO, RAFAEL · 2009 to 2025
$5.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000363Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The calorie restriction paradigm has provided one of the most widely used and most useful tools for investigating mechanisms of aging and longevity. By far, rodent models have been employed most often in these endeavors. Over decades of investigation, claims have been made that the paradigm produces the most robust demonstration that aging is malleable. In the current review of the rodent literature, we present arguments that question the robustness of the paradigm to increase lifespan and healthspan. Specifically, there are several questions to consider as follows: (1) At what age does CR no longer produce benefits? (2) Does CR attenuate cognitive decline? (3) Are there negative effects of CR, including effects on bone health, wound healing, and response to infection? (4) How important is schedule of feeding? (5) How long does CR need to be imposed to be effective? (6) How do genotype and gender influence CR? (7) What role does dietary composition play? Consideration of these questions produce many caveats that should guide future investigations to move the field forward.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionLongevityAge FactorsAgingAnimalsCognitionDietHumansRodentiaChronic diseaseDiet restrictionFastingHealthspanLifespanLongevityLow calorie dietsMortalityNutritionProtein restriction

Identifiers

PMID28610949
PMCPMC5565679
OpenAlexW2623319173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.