ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2017
Preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for solving the penalized-likelihood SPECT reconstruction problem.
Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe authors recently developed a preconditioned alternating projection algorithm (PAPA) for solving the penalized-likelihood SPECT reconstruction problem. The proposed algorithm can solve a wide variety of non-differentiable optimization models. This work is dedicated to comparing the performance of PAPA with total variation (TV) regularization (TV-PAPA) and a novel forward-backward algorithm with nested expectation maximization (EM)-TV iteration scheme (FB-EM-TV).
methodsMonte Carlo technique was used to simulate multiple noise realizations of the fan-beam collimated SPECT data for a piecewise constant phantom with warm background, and hot and cold spheres with uniform activities at two noise levels. They were reconstructed using the aforementioned algorithms with attenuation, scatter, distance-dependent collimator blurring and sensitivity corrections. Noise suppressing performance, lesion detectability, lesion contrast, contrast recovery coefficient, convergence speed and selection of optimal parameters were evaluated. The conventional EM algorithms with TV post-filter (TVPF-EM) and Gaussian post-filter (GPF-EM) were used as benchmarks.
resultsThe TV-PAPA and FB-EM-TV demonstrated similar performance in all investigated categories. Both algorithms outperformed TVPF-EM in terms of image noise suppression, lesion detectability, lesion contrast and convergence speed. We established that the optimal parameters versus information density approximately followed power laws, which offers a guidance in parameter selection for reconstruction methods.
conclusionsFor the simulated SPECT data, TV-PAPA and FB-EM-TV produced qualitatively and quantitatively similar images. They performed better than the benchmark TVPF-EM and GPF-EM, with only limited loss of lesion contrast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.