Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28610633›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2017

Health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers' views on health, health promotion, health assets and deficits: qualitative study in seven Spanish regions.

Mariona Pons-Vigués, Anna Berenguera, Núria Coma-Auli, Haizea Pombo-Ramos, Sebastià March, Angela Asensio-Martínez, Patricia Moreno-Peral, Sara Mora-Simón, Maria Martínez-Andrés, Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03136211 (A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of a Complex Multiple Risk Intervention to Promote Healthy Behaviors in People Between 45 to 75 Years Attended in Primary Health Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03136211 nacompletednot on this map

A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of a Complex Multiple Risk Intervention to Promote Healthy Behaviors in People Between 45 to 75 Years Attended in Primary Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i GurinaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled3,062ConditionsHealth Behavior, Health Promotion, Primary Health Care, Implementation ResearchArmsEIRA intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Right by your side? - the relational scope of health and wellbeing as congruence, complement and coincidence.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mariona Pons-ViguésInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Av. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, àtic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain. mponsv@idiapjgol.info.
Anna BerengueraInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Av. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, àtic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria Coma-AuliInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Av. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, àtic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Haizea Pombo-RamosPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
Sebastià MarchPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Balearic Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Angela Asensio-MartínezAragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain.
Patricia Moreno-PeralInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Distrito Sanitario Málaga-Guadalhorce, Málaga, Spain.
Sara Mora-SimónPrimary Care Research Unit, The Alamedilla Health Centre, Castilla and León Health Service (SACyL), Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Maria Martínez-AndrésSocial and Health Care Research Centre, University of Castilla- La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Enriqueta Pujol-RiberaInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Av. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, àtic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough some articles have analysed the definitions of health and health promotion from the perspective of health-care users and health care professionals, no published studies include the simultaneous participation of health-care users, primary health care professionals and key community informants. Understanding the perception of health and health promotion amongst these different stakeholders is crucial for the design and implementation of successful, equitable and sustainable measures that improve the health and wellbeing of populations. Furthermore, the identification of different health assets and deficits by the different informants will generate new evidence to promote healthy behaviours, improve community health and wellbeing and reduce preventable inequalities. The objective of this study is to explore the concept of health and health promotion and to compare health assets and deficits as identified by health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers with the ultimate purpose to collect the necessary data for the design and implementation of a successful health promotion intervention.

methodsA descriptive-interpretive qualitative research was conducted with 276 participants from 14 primary care centres of 7 Spanish regions. Theoretical sampling was used for selection. We organized 11 discussion groups and 2 triangular groups with health-care users; 30 semi-structured interviews with key community informants; and 14 discussion groups with primary health care workers. A thematic content analysis was carried out.

resultsHealth-care users and key community informants agree that health is a complex, broad, multifactorial concept that encompasses several interrelated dimensions (physical, psychological-emotional, social, occupational, intellectual, spiritual and environmental). The three participants' profiles consider health promotion indispensable despite defining it as complex and vague. In fact, most health-care users admit to having implemented some change to promote their health. The most powerful motivators to change lifestyles are having a disease, fear of becoming ill and taking care of oneself to maintain health. Health-care users believe that the main difficulties are associated with the physical, social, working and family environment, as well as lack of determination and motivation. They also highlight the need for more information. In relation to the assets and deficits of the neighbourhood, each group identifies those closer to their role.

conclusionsGenerally, participants showed a holistic and positive concept of health and a more traditional, individual approach to health promotion. We consider therefore crucial to depart from the model of health services that focuses on the individual and the disease toward a socio-ecological health model that substantially increases the participation of health-care users and emphasizes health promotion, wellbeing and community participation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunity ParticipationHealth PromotionAdultAgedFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth ResourcesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSpainHealthHealth assetsHealth promotionPatient participationPrimary Health CareQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28610633
PMCPMC5470288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.