Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28610617›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2017

Stimulating collaboration between human and veterinary health care professionals.

Björn G M Eussen, Jaap Schaveling, Maria J Dragt, Robert Jan Blomme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Björn G M EussenCenter for Leadership and Management Development, Nyenrode Business University, P.O. Box 130, 3620 AC, Breukelen, Netherlands. B.Eussen@nyenrode.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-3382
Jaap SchavelingCenter for Leadership and Management Development, Nyenrode Business University, P.O. Box 130, 3620 AC, Breukelen, Netherlands.
Maria J DragtCenter for Leadership and Management Development, Nyenrode Business University, P.O. Box 130, 3620 AC, Breukelen, Netherlands.
Robert Jan BlommeCenter for Leadership and Management Development, Nyenrode Business University, P.O. Box 130, 3620 AC, Breukelen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the need to control outbreaks of (emerging) zoonotic diseases and the need for added value in comparative/translational medicine, jointly addressed in the One Health approach [One health Initiative (n.d.a). About the One Health Initiative. http://www.onehealthinitiative.com/about.php . Accessed 13 September 2016], collaboration between human and veterinary health care professionals is limited. This study focuses on the social dilemma experienced by health care professionals and ways in which an interdisciplinary approach could be developed.

resultsBased on Gaertner and Dovidio's Common Ingroup Identity Model, a number of questionnaires were designed and tested; with PROGRESS, the relation between collaboration and common goal was assessed, mediated by decategorization, recategorization, mutual differentiation and knowledge sharing. This study confirms the Common Ingroup Identity Model stating that common goals stimulate collaboration. Decategorization and mutual differentiation proved to be significant in this relationship; recategorization and knowledge sharing mediate this relation.

conclusionsIt can be concluded that the Common Ingroup Identity Model theory helps us to understand how health care professionals perceive the One Health initiative and how they can intervene in this process. In the One Health approach, professional associations could adopt a facilitating role.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorMedicineVeterinary MedicineAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesZoonosesCollaborationCommon Ingroup Identity ModelKnowledge sharingOne healthPhysiciansSocial dilemmaVeterinarians

Identifiers

PMID28610617
PMCPMC5470326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.