Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28610580›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2017

Parental decision making involvement and decisional conflict: a descriptive study.

Laura Boland, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Anton Saarimaki, Margaret L Lawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Decision fatigue of surrogate decision-makers: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Hypospadias surgery: understanding parental emotions, decisions and regrets.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura BolandUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Population Health, 125 University Street, room 232, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Jennifer KryworuchkoUniversity of Saskatchewan College of Nursing Health Sciences, E-4220, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, S7N 5E5, SK, Canada.
Anton SaarimakiOttawa Hospital Research Institute & University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Box 711, Ottawa, ON, K2G 0Y1, Canada.
Margaret L LawsonFamily Decision Services, CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1, ON, Canada. Lawson@cheo.on.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecisional conflict is a state of uncertainty about the best treatment option among competing alternatives and is common among adult patients who are inadequately involved in the health decision making process. In pediatrics, research shows that many parents are insufficiently involved in decisions about their child's health. However, little is known about parents' experience of decisional conflict. We explored parents' perceived decision making involvement and its association with parents' decisional conflict.

methodWe conducted a descriptive survey study in a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Our survey was guided by validated decisional conflict screening items (i.e., the SURE test). We administered the survey to eligible parents after an ambulatory care or emergency department consultation for their child.

resultsFour hundred twenty-nine respondents were included in the analysis. Forty-eight percent of parents reported not being offered treatment options and 23% screened positive for decisional conflict. Parents who reported being offered options experienced less decisional conflict than parents who reported not being offered options (5% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Further, parents with options were more likely to: feel sure about the decision (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15); understand the information (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.63-2.28); be clear about the risks and benefits (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20); and, have sufficient support and advice to make a choice (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11).

conclusionMany parents in our sample experienced decisional conflict after their clinical consultation. Involving parents in the decision making process might reduce their risk of decisional conflict. Evidence based interventions that support parent decision making involvement, such as shared decision making, should be evaluated and implemented in pediatrics as a strategy to reduce parents' decisional conflict.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingProfessional-Family RelationsUncertaintyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesDecisional conflictFamily centered careParentsPediatricsShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID28610580
PMCPMC5470309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.