Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28610416›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2017

Bacterial Vaginosis and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Is there an Association or is Co-Existence Incidental?

Pushpa Sodhani, Sanjay Gupta, Ruchika Gupta, Ravi Mehrotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pushpa SodhaniDivision of Cytopathology, National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India. Email: sodhanip@yahoo.com
Sanjay Gupta
Ruchika Gupta
Ravi Mehrotra
National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine associations, if any, of bacterial vaginosis with cervical pre-neoplastic lesions and evaluate any effects of sub-categorization of smears with bacterial vaginosis. Methods: All cervico-vaginal smears reported as positive for bacterial vaginosis over a five-year period were reviewed and sub-categorized into ‘type I (dysbacteriosis)’ and ‘type II (pure Gardenerella infection)’ smears by two cytopathologists (PS, SG). The proportion of smears with healthy flora and pre-neoplastic lesions was compared with those having bacterial vaginosis in conjunction with such changes. In addition, a comparison was also attempted between the frequencies of pre-neoplastic lesions with the two categories of bacterial vaginosis smears. Results: Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 28.6% (7017 of the 24,565) of the 24,565 smears received in the Institute during the study period. Of these 7,017 smears with bacterial vaginosis, 53% (3717) were categorized as type I and 42.7% (3000) as type II by both cytopathologists. Pre-neoplastic lesions were detected in 10.2% of smears with bacterial vaginosis compared to 5.7% of those with healthy flora (P<0.0001). Of the sub-categories of bacterial vaginosis, the risk of detecting precancerous lesion was higher for type II smears (P<0.001). Conclusion: Sub-categorization of bacterial vaginosis, as performed in the Dutch coding system, may be worthwhile due to the strikingly different risk of associated preneoplasia.

Indexed as

associationBacterial vaginosiscervical intraepithelial neoplasiadysbacteriosis

Identifiers

PMID28610416
PMCPMC5555537
OpenAlexW2617640007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.