Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28609682›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2017

Cryo-EM of bacterial pili and archaeal flagellar filaments.

Edward H Egelman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Designability of α-Helical Protein Filaments.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Integrative Structure and Function of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Characterization of a glycan-binding complex of minor pilins completes the analysis ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing the Stability of Biological Fibrils by Molecular-Scale Simulations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Edward H EgelmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0733, United States. Electronic address: egelman@virginia.edu.

Funding

Structure & Function of Clostridium difficile Type IV PiliR01AI114902 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SUNDBERG, ERIC JOHN · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have opened up the possibility that a large class of biological structures, helical polymers, may now be readily reconstructed at near-atomic resolution. This will have a huge impact, since most of these structures are unlikely to be crystallized. This review focuses on new cryo-EM studies involving three classes of bacterial pili (chaperone-usher, mating, and Type IV) as well as on archaeal flagellar filaments. While it has long been known that one domain within archaeal flagellar filaments is homologous to a domain within bacterial Type IV pilins, the new studies shed light on how homologous and even highly conserved subunits can pack together in different ways with only small changes in sequence.

Indexed as

ArchaeaCryoelectron MicroscopyFimbriae, BacterialFlagella

Identifiers

PMID28609682
PMCPMC5683938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.