ArticlePloS one2017
Quickly identifying identical and closely related subjects in large databases using genotype data.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetically adjusted PSA levels for prostate cancer screening.Nature medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Association between ABO and Duffy blood types and circulating chemokines and cytokines.Genes and immunity · 2021Trial
- Reporting and representation of population descriptors in public RNA-seq databases.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Multitrait analysis of genome-wide association studies expands eosinophilic esophagitis genetic susceptibility and polygenic risk scores.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Structural Variation on Alzheimer's Disease in the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project.Research square · 2026Article
- Anthropometric and Metabolic Traits Across Ancestries in the UK Biobank.Journal of obesity · 2026Article
- GrafGen: distance-based inference of population ancestry for Helicobacter pylori genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- High-throughput proteomics identifies inflammatory proteins associated with disease severity and genetic ancestry in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.The British journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Genomic alterations in normal breast tissues preceding breast cancer diagnosis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- A framework for sharing of clinical and genetic data for precision medicine applications.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Private detection of relatives in forensic genomics using homomorphic encryption.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
- Social, Behavioral, and Clinical Risk Factors Are Associated with Clonal Hematopoiesis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Genetic risk factors for severe and fatigue dominant long COVID and commonalities with ME/CFS identified by combinatorial analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- HostSeq: a Canadian whole genome sequencing and clinical data resource.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Genetic risk factors for ME/CFS identified using combinatorial analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Phenome-wide association study of loci harboring de novo tandem repeat mutations in UK Biobank exomes.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Privacy-aware estimation of relatedness in admixed populations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A machine learning approach for missing persons cases with high genotyping errors.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Relative impact of genetic ancestry and neighborhood socioeconomic status on all-cause mortality in self-identified African Americans.PloS one · 2022Article
- GRAF-pop: A Fast Distance-Based Method To Infer Subject Ancestry from Multiple Genotype Datasets Without Principal Components Analysis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) usually rely on the assumption that different samples are not from closely related individuals. Detection of duplicates and close relatives becomes more difficult both statistically and computationally when one wants to combine datasets that may have been genotyped on different platforms. The dbGaP repository at the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) contains datasets from hundreds of studies with over one million samples. There are many duplicates and closely related individuals both within and across studies from different submitters. Relationships between studies cannot always be identified by the submitters of individual datasets. To aid in curation of dbGaP, we developed a rapid statistical method called Genetic Relationship and Fingerprinting (GRAF) to detect duplicates and closely related samples, even when the sets of genotyped markers differ and the DNA strand orientations are unknown. GRAF extracts genotypes of 10,000 informative and independent SNPs from genotype datasets obtained using different methods, and implements quick algorithms that enable it to find all of the duplicate pairs from more than 880,000 samples within and across dbGaP studies in less than two hours. In addition, GRAF uses two statistical metrics called All Genotype Mismatch Rate (AGMR) and Homozygous Genotype Mismatch Rate (HGMR) to determine subject relationships directly from the observed genotypes, without estimating probabilities of identity by descent (IBD), or kinship coefficients, and compares the predicted relationships with those reported in the pedigree files. We implemented GRAF in a freely available C++ program of the same name. In this paper, we describe the methods in GRAF and validate the usage of GRAF on samples from the dbGaP repository. Other scientists can use GRAF on their own samples and in combination with samples downloaded from dbGaP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.