Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28609280›Full record

ReviewJBRA assisted reproduction2017

The history behind successful uterine transplantation in humans.

Luis Arturo Ruvalcaba Castellón, Martha Isolina García Amador, Roberto Enrique Díaz González, Montoya Sarmiento Jorge Eduardo, César Díaz-García, Niclas Kvarnström, Mats Bränström

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. New Frontiers in Reproductive Health: Australians' Support for Uterus Transplantation.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Custodiol-N Is Superior to CustodiolInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Luis Arturo Ruvalcaba CastellónMexican Infertility Institute [Instituto Mexicano de Infertilidad (imi)], Guadalajara, Jalisco-Mexico.
Martha Isolina García AmadorMexican Infertility Institute [Instituto Mexicano de Infertilidad (imi)], Guadalajara, Jalisco-Mexico.
Roberto Enrique Díaz GonzálezMexican Infertility Institute [Instituto Mexicano de Infertilidad (imi)], Guadalajara, Jalisco-Mexico.
Montoya Sarmiento Jorge EduardoMexican Infertility Institute [Instituto Mexicano de Infertilidad (imi)], Guadalajara, Jalisco-Mexico.
César Díaz-GarcíaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, La Fe University Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Niclas KvarnströmSahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mats BränströmSahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stockholm IVF · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aimed to describe the basic aspects of uterine transplant (UTx) research in humans, including preliminary experiences in rodents and domestic species. Studies in rats, domestic species, and non-human primates validated and optimized the UTx procedure in terms of its surgical aspects, immunosuppression, rejection diagnosis, peculiarities of pregnancy in immunosuppressed patients, and patients with special uterine conditions. In animal species, the first live birth from UTx was achieved in a syngeneic mouse model in 2003. Twenty-five UTx procedures have been performed in humans. The first two cases were unsuccessful, but established the need for rigorous research to improve success rates. As a result of a controlled clinical study under a strictly designed research protocol, nine subsequent UTx procedures have resulted in six healthy live births, the first of them in 2014. Further failed UTx procedures have been performed in China, Czech Republic, Brazil, Germany, and the United States, most of which using living donors. Albeit still an experimental procedure in, UTx is the first potential alternative for the treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI).

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchAnimalsFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleMiceOrgan TransplantationPregnancyRabbitsRatsSheepSwineUterusinfertilitytransplantationuterus

Identifiers

PMID28609280
PMCPMC5473706
OpenAlexW2617349496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.