Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28608960›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2017

Theta band power increases in the posterior hippocampus predict successful episodic memory encoding in humans.

Jui-Jui Lin, Michael D Rugg, Sandhitsu Das, Joel Stein, Daniel S Rizzuto, Michael J Kahana, Bradley C Lega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precise temporal dynamics of ripple events support order memory in human hippocampal-cortical circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jui-Jui LinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390.
Michael D RuggCenter for Vital Longevity, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, 75390.
Sandhitsu DasDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.
Joel SteinDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.
Daniel S RizzutoDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.
Michael J KahanaDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.
Bradley C LegaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390.ORCID 0000-0003-3634-406X

Funding

Comparison of fMRI and iEEG metrics of hippocampal connectivity during memory encodingR21NS095094 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LEGA, BRADLEY C · 2016 to 2017
$454k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS095094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional differences in the anterior and posterior hippocampus during episodic memory processing have not been examined in human electrophysiological data. This is in spite of strong evidence for such differences in rodent data, including greater place cell specificity in the dorsal hippocampus, greater sensitivity to the aversive or motivational content of memories in ventral regions, connectivity analyses identifying preferential ventral hippocampal connections with the amygdala, and gene expression analyses identifying a dorsal-ventral gradient. We asked if memory-related oscillatory patterns observed in human hippocampal recordings, including the gamma band and slow-theta (2.5-5 Hz) subsequent memory effects, would exhibit differences along the longitudinal axis and between hemispheres. We took advantage of a new dataset of stereo electroencephalography patients with simultaneous, robotically targeted anterior, and posterior hippocampal electrodes to directly compare oscillatory subsequent memory effects during item encoding. This same data set allowed us to examine left-right connectivity and hemispheric differences in hippocampal oscillatory patterns. Our data suggest that a power increase during successful item encoding in the 2.5-5 Hz slow-theta frequency range preferentially occurs in the posterior hippocampus during the first 1,000 ms after item presentation, while a gamma band power increase is stronger in the dominant hemisphere. This dominant-nondominant pattern in the gamma range appears to reverse during item retrieval, however. Intrahippocampal phase coherence was found to be stronger during successful item encoding. Our phase coherence data are also consistent with existing reports of a traveling wave for theta oscillations propagating along the septotemporal (longitudinal) axis of the human hippocampus. We examine how our findings fit with theories of functional specialization along the hippocampal axis.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicTheta RhythmDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectrocorticographyGamma RhythmHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsStereotaxic Techniquesanterior hippocampusepisodic memoryposterior hippocampussubsequent memory effecttheta

Identifiers

PMID28608960
PMCPMC6517838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.