ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2017
A novel individual-cell-based mathematical model based on multicellular tumour spheroids for evaluating doxorubicin-related delivery in avascular regions.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manipulating anthracyclines for deeper tissue penetration and implications for glycolytic tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Disrupted hepatic pentose phosphate pathway directly participates in and indirectly promotes CYP3A reduction: A new strategy for CYP3A-mediated drug hepatotoxicity.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Article
- A novel individual-cell-based mathematical model based on multicellular tumour spheroids for evaluating doxorubicin-related delivery in avascular regions.British journal of pharmacology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeEffective drug delivery in the avascular regions of tumours, which is crucial for the promising antitumour activity of doxorubicin-related therapy, is governed by two inseparable processes: intercellular diffusion and intracellular retention. To accurately evaluate doxorubicin-related delivery in the avascular regions, these two processes should be assessed together. Here we describe a new approach to such an assessment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: An individual-cell-based mathematical model based on multicellular tumour spheroids was developed that describes the different intercellular diffusion and intracellular retention kinetics of doxorubicin in each cell layer. The different effects of a P-glycoprotein inhibitor (LY335979) and a hypoxia inhibitor (YC-1) were quantitatively evaluated and compared, in vitro (tumour spheroids) and in vivo (HepG2 tumours in mice). This approach was further tested by evaluating in these models, an experimental doxorubicin derivative, INNO 206, which is in Phase II clinical trials. KEY
resultsInhomogeneous, hypoxia-induced, P-glycoprotein expression compromised active transport of doxorubicin in the central area, that is, far from the vasculature. LY335979 inhibited efflux due to P-glycoprotein but limited levels of doxorubicin outside the inner cells, whereas YC-1 co-administration specifically increased doxorubicin accumulation in the inner cells without affecting the extracellular levels. INNO 206 exhibited a more effective distribution profile than doxorubicin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The individual-cell-based mathematical model accurately evaluated and predicted doxorubicin-related delivery and regulation in the avascular regions of tumours. The described framework provides a mechanistic basis for the proper development of doxorubicin-related drug co-administration profiles and nanoparticle development and could avoid unnecessary clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.