Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28608271›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Repeated subretinal surgery and removal of subretinal decalin is well tolerated - evidence from a porcine model.

Nina Buus Sørensen, Kristian Klemp, Troels Wesenberg Kjær, Steffen Heegaard, Morten la Cour, Jens Folke Kiilgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina Buus SørensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. nina.sorensen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6598-7462
Kristian KlempDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Troels Wesenberg KjærDepartment of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Steffen HeegaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten la CourDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens Folke KiilgaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Candys Foundation 2013-89
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSubretinal perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) is a serious complication that can occur after retinal detachment repair. It is possible to remove the PFCL surgically, but retinal damage related to the procedure is unknown. Also, increasing interest in subretinal treatment makes it relevant to examine the functional and morphological consequences of repeated subretinal manipulation. We hypothesized that PFCL in a porcine model can be injected in the subretinal space and removed with minimal effect on retinal structure and function.

methodsThe left eyes of ten healthy three-month-old female domestic pigs were included. Multifocal electroretinograms (mfERG) were recorded before surgery. Following vitrectomy, a PFCL bleb (decalin) was injected subretinally using a 41G cannula. After 14 days the decalin was removed through a 41G cannula in combination with a 2 ml syringe and an intermediate flexible tube. Two weeks after removal, a control mfERG was recorded, the pigs were enucleated and sacrificed and eyes were examined histologically. All statistics were carried out with a paired t-test in SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1® (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

resultsThere was no significant difference in mfERG amplitude ratio (left/right eye) between baseline and recordings two weeks after removal of decalin (P1 (M = 0.26, SD = 0.80, p = 0.39), second order kernel (M = -0.18, SD = 0.86, p = 0.57), Direct Response (M = 0.39, SD = 0.61, p = 0.12) or Induced Component (M = -0.03, SD = 0.40, p = 0.80)). Histologically, the photoreceptor outer segments were minimally affected. Otherwise the retina was normal 14 days after removal of decalin. In four pigs the subretinal decalin displaced inferiorly and was no longer accessible for removal.

conclusionSubretinal decalin can be removed within 14 days without lasting retinal damage. Decalin is a heavy liquid where the risk of displacement is high. Future studies using PFCLs to control duration of an experimental retinal separation should focus on PFCLs that are isodense to the vitreus body.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyEndotamponadeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesInjections, IntraocularNaphthalenesReoperationRetinaRetinal DetachmentRobotic Surgical ProceduresSubretinal FluidSwineVitrectomydecalinNaphthalenesRetinal detachmentRetinal pigment epitheliumRobotic surgeryRPESubretinal space

Identifiers

PMID28608271
PMCPMC5554275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.