Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28608266›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2018

Potentially pathogenic germline CHEK2 c.319+2T>A among multiple early-onset cancer families.

Mev Dominguez-Valentin, Sigve Nakken, Hélène Tubeuf, Daniel Vodak, Per Olaf Ekstrøm, Anke M Nissen, Monika Morak, Elke Holinski-Feder, Alexandra Martins, Pål Møller and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Summary ofGenes · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic variants of prospectively demonstrated phenocopies inHereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mev Dominguez-ValentinDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. mev_dv@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7856-0057
Sigve NakkenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hélène TubeufNormandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie Univ, Rouen, France.
Daniel VodakDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Per Olaf EkstrømDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anke M NissenMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich, Germany.
Monika MorakMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich, Germany.
Elke Holinski-FederMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra MartinsNormandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie Univ, Rouen, France.
Pål MøllerDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eivind HovigDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOLMU Klinikum · DEInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the potential contribution of genes other than BRCA1/2, PTEN, and TP53 to the biological and clinical characteristics of multiple early-onset cancers in Norwegian families, including early-onset breast cancer, Cowden-like and Li-Fraumeni-like syndromes (BC, CSL and LFL, respectively). The Hereditary Cancer Biobank from the Norwegian Radium Hospital was used to identify early-onset BC, CSL or LFL for whom no pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, PTEN, or TP53 had been found in routine diagnostic DNA sequencing. Forty-four cancer susceptibility genes were selected and analyzed by our in-house designed TruSeq amplicon-based assay for targeted sequencing. Protein- and RNA splicing-dedicated in silico analyses were performed for all variants of unknown significance (VUS). Variants predicted as the more likely to affect splicing were experimentally analyzed by minigene assay. We identified a CSL individual carrying a variant in CHEK2 (c.319+2T>A, IVS2), here considered as likely pathogenic. Out of the five VUS (BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MAP3K1, NOTCH3) tested in the minigene splicing assay, only NOTCH3 c.14090C>T (p.Ser497Leu) showed a significant effect on RNA splicing, notably by inducing partial skipping of exon 9. Among 13 early-onset BC, CSL and LFL patients, gene panel sequencing identified a potentially pathogenic variant in CHEK2 that affects a canonical RNA splicing signal. Our study provides new information on genetic loci that may affect the risk of developing cancer in these patients and their families, demonstrating that genes presently not routinely tested in molecular diagnostic settings may be important for capturing cancer predisposition in these families.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge of OnsetBreast NeoplasmsCheckpoint Kinase 2ExonsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHamartoma Syndrome, MultipleHumansLi-Fraumeni SyndromeMiddle AgedMitochondrial DiseasesNorwayCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanCHEK2Cowden-like syndromeEarly-onset breast cancerGene panel testingLi-Fraumeni-like syndromeRNA splicing mutations

Identifiers

PMID28608266
OpenAlexW2626656567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.