ArticleThe AAPS journal2017
The Impact of Disintegrant Type, Surfactant, and API Properties on the Processability and Performance of Roller Compacted Formulations of Acetaminophen and Aspirin.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality by design-based optimization and HP-TLC densitometric standardization ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Formulation and In Vivo Evaluation of a Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System Using Oily Liquid Tocotrienols as Model Active Substance.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of a Discriminatory Dissolution Model for an Immediately Release Dosage Form by DOE and Statistical Approaches.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Article
- Development of a dissolution method for lumefantrine and artemether in immediate release fixed dose artemether/lumefantrine tablets.Malaria journal · 2020Article
- Power of the Dissolution Test in Distinguishing a Change in Dosage Form Critical Quality Attributes.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In formulation development, certain excipients, even though used in small quantities, can have a significant impact on the processability and performance of the dosage form. In this study, three common disintegrants, croscarmellose sodium (CCS), crospovidone (xPVP), and sodium starch glycolate (SSG) as well as the surfactant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) were evaluated for their impact on the processability and performance of a typical dry granulation formulation. Two model compounds, the mechanically brittle and chemically inert acetaminophen and the mechanically ductile carboxylic acid aspirin, were used for the evaluation. It was found that the disintegrants were generally identical in their impact on the processability and little difference was observed in the granulation and compression processes. The exception is that when xPVP was used in the formulation of the brittle acetaminophen, lower compression forces were needed to reach the same tablet hardness, suggesting a binding effect of xPVP for such systems. In general, CCS and xPVP tend to provide slightly better disintegration than SSG. However, in the case of aspirin, a strong hydrogen bonding interaction between the carboxylic acid group of aspirin and the carbonyl group of xPVP was observed, resulting in slower release of the drug after fast disintegration. SLS was found to have a significant impact on the processability due to its lubricating effect, resulting in higher compression forces needed to achieve the target tablet hardness. Due to the higher degree of compression, the disintegration and dissolution of both drugs became slower despite the wetting effect of SLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.